answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Smaller stars burn less fuel and live longer. A star like ours can exist for more than ten times the size of a star 50 times it's size.

The bigger the star, the stronger it's gravitational pull, and therefore the more intense the nuclear fusion at it's core. Massive stars have a tendency to explode long before they get to be the size of our sun, which has to do with how black holes form, sometimes they collapse back in on themselves.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

At higher masses, the star's gravitation will be greater, resulting in more pressure and a higher temperature. This will increase the rate of nuclear fusion - and thus make the star use up its fuel faster.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

The life cycle depends on its mass because of the way a star operates. Stars are basically factories, they are formed from clouds of dust gasses and slowly spin and contract creating lots of heat. The gasses are usually mostly hydrogen and helium. When the gasses reach a temperature of 10,000,000 kelvin, hydrogen nuclear fusion can take place. The hydrogen gets fused onto helium, and other elements begin to form from fusion such as carbon, neon, silica, oxygen are some examples, and finally iron which from what we know cannot fuse into a heavier element. The more mass a star has the hotter it will be the more efficient and faster the conversion process will be. Soon the center of the star will begin to fill with the heavier elements, usually the iron, and the hydrogen will be pushed further and further away from the hot center that it loves so much. The fuel the star started out with will soon be fused into other elements until the process slows. The star will begin to expand turning into a red giant and shrinking into a dwarf star or if massive enough going supernova. A very massive star may "live" 10 million years where as a smaller star say our sun can live to a ripe old age of 10 billion years. A simple way to look at it is this, a top-fuel dragster (very large star) consumes about 24 GALLONs in 1mile where as a Honda sedan (small star) consumes 1gallon every 24miles. I hope this answers your question.
The greater the mass the shorter its life because it burns its fuel faster
the more mass a star has the shorter its life is

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

"The bigger they are, the harder they fall!"

It is uncommon to invoke the poet Edna St. Vincent Millay in a discussion of astronomical physics, but she was precisely on target with her poem "First Fig".

My candle burns at both ends;

It will not last the night;

But ah, my foes, and oh, my friends-

It gives a lovely light.

The larger a star is, the faster it burns and the more quickly it evolves. Large stars die sooner and more spectacularly than small stars. Small, dim red dwarf stars like Proxima Centauri will probably survive for a trillion years, while red supergiants like Betelgeuse are old and ready to go supernova after only 100 million years.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Low mass stars tend to live to a ripe old age. They convert their supply of hydrogen very slowly. Large mass stars can have a long life, but tend to live a shorter time. Very large mass stars, as a general rule, will have a short life. Reason: The larger a stars mass, the more furiously it converts it's fuel. Hence, the quicker it comes to it's end.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Yes, and depending on the mass, the difference can be quite dramatic. Stars that are only a few tens of times more massive than our Sun may last just a few million years, while our Sun will have a total lifetime of about 10 billion years, and red dwarves (with a mass of at least 0.075 solar masses) can last trillions of years.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Generally the smaller the mass the longer the star lives. Red Dwarfs the smallest stars often also have the longest lives.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

The opposite. The larger a star is the shorter it's life sequence is.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

More mass causes the star's gravity to be stronger. This will cause greater pressure and temperature, making the nuclear reactions faster - the star will use up its fuel much faster.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

A star with less mass has a longer life span. More massive stars get hotter, shine brighter, and spend their fuel much faster.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Will stars with less mass last longer than stars with bigger mass?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What stars have the longer life span?

The smaller stars generally live longer due to less mass & less hydrogen is burned.


What kind of stars last the longest?

Stars that burn cooler and dimmer use less fuel, and so will last longer before they go out. smaller stars are generally more stable than larger ones, and so usually last longer because they contract into dwarf stars instead of going supernova. going with those assumptions, the longest-burning star would be a red dwarf star.


Do all stars end their life cycle the same way?

No because smaller stars can live longer than bigger stars and the big stars wont live as long but will end in a very violent explosion.That can result in a major supernova and even a black hole smaller stars will die in a much less violent way.


Does gum last longer with less sugar?

Yes


How scientists classify Stars?

In accordance with their mass. More massive stars by default are bluer and burn more quickly, go supernovae and can become a black hole or neutron star, depending on it's mass. Less massive stars are redder, last longer because they don't burn their fuel as furiously and don't go supernovae and don't become really dense stars after their "shed" their outer layer like the bigger ones do. There is even a category of 'failed stars', which is when a gas giant didn't get big enough to to activate nuclear fusion in its core. Jupiter is in this category. If it had been a bit bigger, it would have been another sun.


What type of star ages faster?

The most massive stars; they will use up their fuel much faster than less-massive stars. or even low mass star which is less then half the mass of our sun may able to last more then a trillion years that is longer then the universe age


Why will fossil and nuclear fuels last longer if we also use renewable energy resources?

The more renewable energy we use the less non-renewable energy we use. And if we use less of it, it'll last longer.


Does the dsi's battery last longer than the ds lite?

No, sadly, it lasts less longer then the DS lite...


How long would main sequence star last if twice as massive as the sun?

A star with a mass of 2solar masses, 2times the mass of the sun, would have a main-sequence stage of half the life of a star with the mass of our sun. More massive stars die faster, less massive stars live longer and therefore have longer main-sequence stages.


Do smaller stars have longer lives?

If by smaller, you mean ones with less mass, then the answer is yes. This is because while smaller stars have less mass to burn. They burn it more slowly and more efficiently thereby increasing their lifespan.


How many minutes do weak tornadoes last?

Although they can last longer most weak tornadoes last less than 5 minutes.


How long does it take for a game to download on your iPod from ituns?

It all depends. On the speed of your internet, RAM, and how big the file is. The bigger file the longer. The slower internet the longer. The less ram even longer.