answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

First, it is unscientific to accept any theory as fact. A fundamental rule of the scientific method is fallibilism, which recognizes that all knowledge we have is only the closest approximation to the truth that we've found up to now.

A great example of the need for this is uniformitarianism. What the scientists can reasonably say is that what they SEE of hydrogen throughout the universe APPEARS to be the same. Or whatever other metric they attempt to test. But they cannot rule out physics changing in ways that would not be observable in this fashion.

When a supposed scientist claims that one must accept theory X as fact in order for science to be useful, he is committing multiple fallacies.

The most important is that feeling the need for something doesn't make it so. If physics has changed, then it has changed, and the inconvenience of this for scientists is their own problem. Refusing to consider this simply cripples scientific endeavor that much more.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

cause they were scientist is some of the answere. it was more than one theory. where the probaly most known is catastrophism. so many belived something else, and scientist is if not dissaproved, stubborn.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why didn't other scientist immediately accept the theory of uniformitaraianism?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why did other scientists not accept Alfred Wegeners theory?

why did other scientist not accpet Alfred Wegeners theory


Do you think it's wise for scientists not to accept a theory immediately even if the theory has a lot of evidence to support it?

Each scientists have there own opinion. Some accept theories and some have to have facts.


4 Imagine that you are a scientist living at the time that Wagner proposed his theory What might you have thought of his theory What biases might you have had that would influence your acceptance of t?

Just accept his theory.


Why do scientist accept the capture theory?

They generally don't. The Giant Impact Hypothesis is generally accepted amongst scientists.


What do a scientist and a non scientist mean by theory?

ideas


What theory did scientist Rutherford create?

The Atomic Theory


What theory did the scientist provide evidence for?

cell theory


What theory did this scientist provide evidence for?

Cell Theory


How do experiments help scientist learn about the world?

experiments test the scientist theory


What scientist do that is the for their investigation?

theory


Why might a scientists theory might not be believed even if it correct?

A scientist's theory might not be believed even it is correct, if the theory is such a radical departure from existing beliefs that it seems bizarre. The theory of continental drift (which, of course, was eventually accepted) was resisted for decades because it just seemed obvious to people that the continents are not drifting, since we do not notice any such motion. It could also happen that a scientist has a valid theory but has not adequately explained, or experimentally tested that theory. Other scientists require evidence in order to accept a theory.


Why do scientist should be open minded?

Because if scientists aren't open-minded, they could try to discredit or change the results of a valid experiment, or not accept a theory that may actually be right, and discredit the theory, therefore stopping progress in science.