New methods worked best on large farms, which could hire many workers and produce big harvests and more profits. This encouraged wealthy landowners to replace small farms with big ones.
In the 1700's small farmers were pushed out due to large farmers growing cash crops such as cotton, tobacco and sugar as opposed to subsistence farming. Large farmers created a situation where small farmers could either become tenant farmers or leave the farming industry all together.
Collective farms were large, government controlled farms formed from small farms that were surrendered by force. These were common in socialist regimes.
The small farms were replaced by large landed estates (latifundia) owned by rich people.
mabye maybe not...:p
slavery
In the 1700's small farmers were pushed out due to large farmers growing cash crops such as cotton, tobacco and sugar as opposed to subsistence farming. Large farmers created a situation where small farmers could either become tenant farmers or leave the farming industry all together.
well they are grown in large corporate farms and for their own family in small family farms
yes, people in Georgia did have small farms and large plantations.
Collective farms were large, government controlled farms formed from small farms that were surrendered by force. These were common in socialist regimes.
collectivitzation
collectivization
Large farms operate more like a production plant than small farms. They produce large amounts of goods, but also have higher overhead too. Small farms often produce a large number of products in smaller quantities.
The small farms were replaced by large landed estates (latifundia) owned by rich people.
small farms
small farms
Southern colonies had rich soil and warm climate
not neccesarily it depend on the way you manage your farm