You might be looking for a more idealistic answer, but practically speaking, the founders were trying to form a union that included states with different religious populations. They needed to avoid federalizing religion.
They did not want the Federal government to set up a single established church for the United States, such as the Church of England was in England. States were initially permitted to have established churches and several did. Subsequently, however, the First Amendment was enacted and it, in concert with the privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment, has since been interpreted by the Supreme Court to prohibit any establishment of a state church in this country.
The idea was to protect churches from government manipulation & control and in particular to prevent governments from becoming instrumentalities for the promotion of religion.
They were leaving Europe because of religoius opression, so freedom of religion woulb be important to them. If they didnt have freedom of religion they would be just like Britian, the country they were leaving.
This Amendment was created so that we would have the freedom to express ourselfs and not have to wrry about getting aressted. it just grants us to say what we got to say and just practice our own religion. This amendment was created so that we can have the freedom to do many things. like practice our own religion, to assemble with people and to have the right to speak freely and not have to worry about being aressted. with out it we wouldn't have the right to do all that stuff.
The Mayan pyramids were important to the Mayans because it was part of their religion
The middle colonies religion was mostly just religious freedom so it was kind of everything.
The fact you can attend any church you wish is religious freedom. If you don't want to go to church you can do that too. That is religious freedom. The state doesn't support any particular religion so there is religious freedom. We don't have a state religion which means you don't have to go to a state church and your aren't punished or arrested for belonging to another religion.
They were leaving Europe because of religoius opression, so freedom of religion woulb be important to them. If they didnt have freedom of religion they would be just like Britian, the country they were leaving.
freedom of religion (apex)
freedom of religion (apex)
Every nation and location deserves freedom of religion so people can live without persecution.
This Amendment was created so that we would have the freedom to express ourselfs and not have to wrry about getting aressted. it just grants us to say what we got to say and just practice our own religion. This amendment was created so that we can have the freedom to do many things. like practice our own religion, to assemble with people and to have the right to speak freely and not have to worry about being aressted. with out it we wouldn't have the right to do all that stuff.
Deism. A belief in God on the basis of Reason alone, while simultaneously being a rejection of supernatural revelation. Christianity being a revealed religion. I believe the Founders wanted there to be no "official" religion in this new country, and to ensure people could worship as they saw fit. The Freedom of Religion guaranteed in the First Amendment also guarantees no religion will be forced upon anyone. This was in reaction to the strict requirements of life in England under the Church of England at the time. So basically, the Founders believed in God in a no-particular-religion-implied sort of way.
There are many different religions in China so there are many different founders.
The Hindu religions are very old religion . So nobody know who was the founder . But maybe the VEDIC MASTERS can be the founders .
Freedom of religion, freedom of speech and freedom of the press
Nothing so clearly biased. Among the principles the Founders laid down were the freedom from a state church, so people could embrace or reject religion.
The Mayan pyramids were important to the Mayans because it was part of their religion
No. It is a contradiction in terms to think of freedom without freedom of religion, just as it would be a contradiction in terms to think of freedom without freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and so on. Freedom means not having to follow any one religion, nor having the values of any one religion imposed on society at large.