0
Who is right about the Second Amendment the US Supreme Court or Heller?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 US ___ (2008)
There is no distinction, because the US Supreme Court decided in favor of Heller and struck down the District of Columbia gun control law as unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is DC vs heller?
Dick A. Heller, a security officer, tried registering a handgun to keep at home for self-defense, but was denied the right by Washington D.C. officials. Eventually, he worked his way up to the famous case, "D.C. v. Heller." The case was a landmark for Second Amendment rights activists because it's the first time in about 70 years that the Supreme Court directly addressed the scope of the Second Amendment, concluding that it is an individual right to bear arms, which is unconnected to service in the militia.
Was the abolition of slavery a US Supreme Court decision?
No. Slavery was abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution in a joint effort between Congress and the states that ratified the amendment. A constitutional amendment is more powerful than a US Supreme Court decision, because it is not subject to change by the Supreme Court.
What did the Supreme Court declare in Miller v Johnson?
The supreme court declared that gerrymandering was unconstitutional because it violated the 14th amendment.
What was the outcome of District of Columbia v. Heller?
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 US ___ (2008)In 2008, the US Supreme Court found in favor of Hellerand upheld Second Amendment protection by striking down a District of Columbia law that unconstitutionally restricted the use and storage of legally owned guns. The decision in Hellerapplied only to the District of Columbia, which is federal territory, and not to the states.McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 US ___ (2010). In McDonald, the Court held self-protection was a fundamental right and incorporated the Second Amendment to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause. The decision was released June 28, 2010.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Can a us president overturn a supreme court amendment?
A U. S. president cannot reverse a U. S. Supreme Court decision or the decision of the Supreme Court of any state or territory.
How has the Supreme Court interpreted the second amendment?
An interpretation of the second Amendment that corresponds with the ruling in District of Columbia vs. Heller is that citizens have the right to keep and bear arms.
Where can you find conflicting supreme court opinions on multiple amendment related cases?
I need to find a supreme court case based on the second amendment and write an essay contrasting two Court Justice's opinions.
What was the latest US Supreme Court ruling on gun rights?
McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 US ___ (2010)McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 US ___ (2010) The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case on March 2, 2010, and released its opinion on June 28, 2010. The Court held self-protection is a fundamental right, and incorporated the Second Amendment to the States via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause.District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 US ___ (2008)In 2008, the US Supreme Court upheld Second Amendment protection in the case District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 US ___ (2008), by striking down a District of Columbia law that unconstitutionally restricted the use and storage of legally owned guns. The decision in Heller applied only to the District of Columbia, which is federal territory, and not to the states, which did not become bound by the Second Amendment until June 2010.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
What is DC vs heller?
Dick A. Heller, a security officer, tried registering a handgun to keep at home for self-defense, but was denied the right by Washington D.C. officials. Eventually, he worked his way up to the famous case, "D.C. v. Heller." The case was a landmark for Second Amendment rights activists because it's the first time in about 70 years that the Supreme Court directly addressed the scope of the Second Amendment, concluding that it is an individual right to bear arms, which is unconnected to service in the militia.
In what case did the Supreme Court refuse to incorporate the Second Amendment to the States via the 14th Amendment?
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542 (1876)The US Supreme Court held the Second Amendment only applied to the Federal government, and that gun regulation was a state's rights issue.
What best describes the US Supreme Court's current interpretation of the right to bear arms?
The US Supreme Court recently incorporated (applied) the Second Amendment to the States in McDonald v. Chicago, (2010). The Court held, as it did in District of Columbia v. Heller,(2008), that the Second Amendment protected the public's right to possess firearms in their homes, and that the amendment was not intended solely for the formation of a militia, but for personal protection, as well. Restrictions against felons owning guns and other federal legislation still applies.
What is the supreme court's position on the Thu amendment?
There is no thu amendment.
What amendment has never been subject to a supreme court?
ninth amendment
What amendment is polygamy in?
Polygamy is not in any amendment, it was outlawed by a Supreme Court decision.
Should the US Supreme Court ban guns?
Absolutely not! For one, bad guys do not follow the law, and will smuggle in guns. When they do that, the law-abiding citizens will have nothing to defend themselves with. Also, the job of the supreme court is to interpret the constitution. The 2nd amendment says, "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." If the supreme court banned guns, that would be doing the thing it is not supposed to be doing.More information:The US Supreme Court upheld the Second Amendment right to bear arms in District of Columbia v. Heller, (2008) and McDonald v. Chicago, (2010). The McDonald ruling incorporated the Second Amendment to the states, ensuring states cannot pass overly restrictive laws regarding gun ownership. Banning guns altogether would be unconstitutional.
To which amendment does this Supreme Court decision refer?
Since you didn't say WHICH Supreme Court decision, there is no way to answer the question.
Was the abolition of slavery a US Supreme Court decision?
No. Slavery was abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution in a joint effort between Congress and the states that ratified the amendment. A constitutional amendment is more powerful than a US Supreme Court decision, because it is not subject to change by the Supreme Court.
