0
Which of these statements is trure regarding the philosophy of stoicism?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
There is no afterlife
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is it trure there are more fossils in warm wet tropical areas?
No
When did the religious revolution started?
Islam is the only trure religion in the world
Is it trure or false that Congress created the Freedman and Bureau to assist African Americans in the adjustments of living free.?
no they did not it was the abolitionist in the 1850's
Why does Youtube sometimes take too much time to review our copyright videos?
Because it takes a lot of loading so be pachent ok 1000% trure
Is mass the same as weight True or false?
It is not the same. Read the Wikipedia article on "mass versus weight" for a detailed discussion.
You have irregular periods and your last 2 periods came on time Now symptoms not sure if they are pregnancy symptoms or pms you have diarrhea headaches frequent peeing heartburn bloating got neg tests?
so you havnt missed a period and have had negative tests, that is a good sign, i mean if you do not want to be, all the other symptoms you have named could deffinatly be pms, and they are not just trure to pregnancy those symptoms can come from any where and it might just all be in your head, that you are convinced you are pregnant that you think you have these signs, i would talk to a medical prefessional
What colour is Tiger Woods lucky pair of socks?
Well coming from a news article in New York I have heard that his lucky pair of socks were pink with blue dots and brown tinier dots. Everyone there was talking about this and i never knew that it would come trure. Oh my dreams of marrying him have not yet succeeded but someday will due to my fairytale friend Nook.Last year my dog ran away and came back today aren't u so happy for me.i cant wait to meat u somedayi am ur husbandi do love ui am u lovei do want u to sleep with mei am......007 (double o seven)This is a joke
What interest does the New Testament have for modern historians?
A:Early historians believed the New Testament to be literally trure and therefore a good basis for understanding the history of the first century, just as they believed the Old Testament to be literally true and thus a good basis for understanding the history of earlier times. As they began to study the New Testament in greater detail, historians learnt that it was not literally true, but assumed it was substantially true. Most modern historians now recognise that there are sufficient concerns with the New Testament that it can not be used as a basis for understanding the history of the first century, unless corroborated by other, more reliable sources. At the same time. many historians are Christian and believe the teachings, ethic and moral of the New Testament to be true, regardless of its historicity. Just as the gospels were seen as reports of events that occurred during the lifetime of Jesus, Acts of the Apostles was long considered to be a detailed, scholarly history of the early Church. However, the theologian Hans Joachim Schoeps writes (Das Judenchristentum) that Acts has been "believed much too readily." He says that in reality Acts is only a biased, retrospective view of Christian origins. Anyone used to evaluating texts critically has no choice but to rate it as a document of the second or even third Christian generation. Acts follows a clear didactic line and for this reason energetically cultivates the creation of legends and reshapes persons and events according to its own standards. This is not a description that would encourage a historian to look for nuggets of historical truth in Acts.Interest in the Bible has been largely reversed for historians. Rather than being seen as a reliable basis for the study of ancient history, it is now of interest to test the biblical accounts against extra-biblical sources, to establish the extent to which the New Testament can be verified.
