Some examples that come to mind:
It may be appropriate to refuse to obey a law that is demonstrably oppressive. For example, in a one-party state, such a law may be intended to suppress opposition or intimidate those who disagree with government policy. In other cases, it may be intended to suppress religious minorities. If a law forbids gatherings of opposition supporters, then it could be considered right to gather in protest.
If a law demands confidentiality within the public service, but a public servant is aware of corruption, illegality or improper conduct, it could be considered right to ignore the confidentiality and pass on damning information to the media. Such a person is known as a 'whistle-blower'.
If the law allows destruction of culturally sensitive buildings purely for profit, or the destruction of endangered ecologies, it could be considered right to protest and even attempt to prevent the proposed destruction. Of course, it can become a matter of judgement whether a structure is really culturally sensitive or an environment is really endangered.
Some believe that refusing to serve in the armed forces, on the grounds of conscience, is right.
The answer depends on the particular church and the nature of the violation of church law.
civil disobedience
Refusing to obey!
Disobedient.
Refusing to obey rules or someone in authority.
Insubordination, or insubordinate
"The troublesome student was sent to detention for refusing to obey the teacher when asked to cease distracting the rest of the class."
No, someone who is insubordinate is a person refusing or failing to obey.
Obey The Law was created on 1926-11-05.
The ability to vote is a privilege, not a right. Simply not voting does not mean you can just ignore any law you want.
You should always obey the law. Religious or not.
Some states believed in the doctrine of states rights in which they did not have to obey Federal Laws if they felt that it violated the constitution.