Limits to free speech were constitutional during national emergencies.
The 9-0 vote was unanimous, with Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. writing the Court opinion, which was signed by all Justices.
Schenck v. United States, (1919) was a landmark ruling in which Justice Holmes established the "clear and present danger" test as a constitutional exception to the seemingly absolute ban on Congress's making any law abridging freedom of speech under the First Amendment.
The vote was:
Chief Justice
Edward D. White
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
William Day
Willis Van Devanter
Mahlon Pitney
James McReynolds
Louis Brandeis
John Clarke
Case Citation:
Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919)
Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919)
There was no dissenting opinion in Schenck; the 9-0 vote was unanimous in support of the US government. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., wrote the opinion of the Court.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
the answer is still unknown and guess what even i need help with this so instead of asking this question on the web, why dont you go and look up the information you need. and dont say that you could find it you need to be really precise in what you are exactly looking for.
During WWI, leaflets were sent to draft age men urging resistance to induction to the military. This was ruled as treason according to the Espionage Act of 1917, and could be enforced. Defense was pleading First Amendment rights, which was declined in the view of the justices. If the leaflets had succeeded, then the "clear and present danger" to the US was present and so they lost.
The US won
Freedom of speech
Limits to free speech were constitutional during national emergencies.
Freedom of speech
ur mom
Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896) and Schenck v. United States, (1919) are two completely unrelated US Supreme Court cases. For more information on these cases, see Related Questions, below.
During a time of war. -Apex
(in the US) The US Supreme Court.
Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes joined the Court majority in upholding Schenck's conviction in the 1919 case Schenck v. United States. Schenck, an anti-war Socialist, had been convicted of violating the Act, after he published a pamphlet urging resistance to the World War I draft. Later court decisions have cast serious doubt upon the constitutionality of the Espionage Act.
In theory, any court can decide this, but only the decisions of the US Supreme Court are binding in regards to the US constitution (for State constitutions, the state's Supreme Court is generally the final arbiter... the US Supreme Court might rule that a particular provision in a state's constitution is not compatible with the US constitution, but usually will let the state court decide for itself in strictly internal matters.)
The US Supreme Court serves as the final court of appeal
the Supreme Court