answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Local, State, and National Governments typically will attempt to shape policy around the idea of a multiplier effect if they understand the concept. The idea is of course that policies will attract more spending in their respective forum and so enjoy the benefits of the monetary multiplier. This means for example that one dollar ($1) spent in a local economy such as Atlanta may generate as much as $4-$10 in economic growth to the local community. This same concept can be true for spending on the state and national levels.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the relevance of multiplier effect to government policy in economics?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why the government spending multiplier is different form the tax multiplier?

The government spending multiplier is different form the tax multiplier from the top of my head is because the government spending total effect ripples off. That is if government spending increase then the total income increases. When total income increase, consumption increases, when consumption increases total income increases further (as consumption is a factor of total income), and this pattern is carried forward. This is the the multiplier effect, such that an increase in government spending's final impact on income is much bigger than its initial increase. The tax multiplier on the other hand, has a much smaller effect than government spending. This is because tax is only a portion of the consumer income. That is, if there is a tax cut, consumers only save a fractional amount (specifically 1-MPC) of a tax cut. As a result of the smaller boost in spending form ma tax cut, the ripples/multiplier effect of a tax cut is much less than an increase in government spending.


What is Balanced budget multiplier?

BALANCED-BUDGET MULTIPLIER:A measure of the change in aggregate production caused by equal changes in government purchases and taxes. The balanced-budget multiplier is equal to one, meaning that the multiplier effect of a change in taxes offsets all but the initial production triggered by the change in government purchases. This multiplier is the combination of the expenditures multiplier, which measures the change in aggregate production caused by changes in an autonomous aggregate expenditure, and the tax multiplier which measures the change in aggregate production caused by changes in taxes.


What is multiplier effect in the mining industry?

The multiplier effect, is when one job in the mining industry creates 4 new jobs in other industries


What is the main idea of the multiplier effect?

The main idea of the multiplier effect is that an initial increase in spending or investment leads to further economic activity and growth. This occurs as the money circulates through the economy, creating a ripple effect as it is spent and respent by individuals and businesses.


Does fiscal policy have a multiplier effect?

yes


What is a travel multiplier?

The travel multiplier measures the effect of the initial tourism spending and the chain of spending that follows.


What does multiplier effect mean?

The multiplier effect describes how an increase in some economic activity starts a chain reaction that generates more activity than the original increase. The multiplier effect demonstrates the impact that reserve requirements set by the Federal Reserve have on the U.S. money supply.


What do taxes and transfer payments act as?

Multiplier Effect


What is the multiplier effect of 1000000 of payroll on the local economy?

4568255


What is the effect of isocost in economics?

effect of isocost


What is investment multiplier?

Investment MultiplierIn economics, the multiplier effect refers to the idea that an initial spending rise can lead to even greater increase in national income. In other words, an initial change in aggregate demand can cause a further change in aggregate output for the economyinvestment multiplier is simply the multiplier effect of an injection of investment into an economy.In general, a multiplier shows how a sum injected into an economy travels and generates more output.For example: a company spends $1 million to build a factory. The money does not disappear, but rather becomes wages to builders, revenue to suppliers etc. The builders will have higher disposable income as a result, so consumption, hence aggregate demand will rise as well. Say that all of these workers combined spend $2 million dollars in total, since there was an initial $1 million input which created a $2 million output, the multiplier is 2.Another example is when a tourist visits somewhere they need to buy the plane ticket, catch a taxi from the airport to the hotel, book in at the hotel, eat at the restaurant and go to the movies or tourist destination. The taxi driver needs petrol for his cab, the hotel needs to hire the staff, the restaurant needs attendants and chefs, and the movies and tourist destinations need staff and cleaners.It must be noted that the extent of the multiplier effect is dependent upon the marginal propensity to consume and marginal propensity to import. Also that the multiplier can work in reverse as well, so an initial fall in spending can trigger further falls in aggregate output.The basic formula for the economic multiplier, in macroeconomics, the change in equilibrium GDP divided by the change in investment (i.e. the initial increase in spending).It is particularly associated with Keynesian economics; some other schools of economic thought reject, or downplay the importance of multiplier effects, particularly in the long run. The multiplier has been used as an argument for government spending or taxation relief to stimulate aggregate demand.The reader should know that "Keynesian economics" is something quite different from the "economics of Keynes". Thus the "other" schools that reject the multiplier effects are those associated with the "economics of Keynes". This school sees the so-called "multiplier effect" as being a variant of the "broken window fallacy" While there may indeed be some small short run impact on unemployed resources from an "initial" cash infusion due to "money illusions", by definition, when inputs are fully employed, by definition, there is no socially useful purpose served by this infusion, other than to fool people into working harder than they wish, for the returns they receive by "working".The concept of the economic multiplier on a macroeconomic scale can be extended to any economic region. For example, building a new factory may lead to new employment for locals, which may have knock-on economic effects for the city or region.OK


How do you calculate the multiplier effect?

by dividing investment with 1 subtract consumption function