You are referring to the doctrine of Respondeat Superior, where a principle may be liable for the actions of his/her agent.
The answer is, it depends on the action, the employment arrangement, and local law.
An employer is absolutely and strictly liable for any injuries his employees sustain while in the course of their occupation. Fortunately, most states have adopted "sole remedy" laws that provide a great deal of protection, for employers, from employee lawsuits, as long as the employer has purchased workers compensation insurance. Talk to a local broker or agent to clarify the laws in your jurisdiction.
For some things -yes. He is a part of your business. Now if you sell shoes and he sold a car or got a girl pregnant That was not in your hiring booklett.
The legal principle is responeat superior.
A company is not liable for employees doing stuff outside the scope of their assigned duties that does not further the employer's interests. An employer has no duty to prevent an employee from being a fool at work.
No, a company can be sued if the company does not exist anymore. The owners of the company may be liable. An attorney can help you decide the best action to take.
Companies should be completely liable for violent acts committed during work by their own employees. Workplace violence is the third leading cause of occupational death and growing type of homicide in the United States. Companies have legal obligation and financial incentive to prevent it because the company can be held liable either directly or vicariously for the violent acts committed by its employees against other employees and even injuries suffered by their employees as a result of violent acts. Companies are held liable when: Negligent hiring of employees, negligent retention and/or inadequate safeguards to provide a "safe and healthful workplace". Company behaves negligently towards workplace violence and thereby permits such violent acts to occur. This is also referred to as direct liability. Company is not directly responsible for the violence and whose conduct was not negligent towards the act but as the employee who caused misconduct belonged to that company, the company is held responsible for it too.
YES!
No, employees are not liable for company losses.
If a user illegally installs software on their home computer, they are held liable. (If a child illegally installs software on a parent's computer, the parent will most likely be held liable, depending upon the age of the child.) The exact person held liable is more sketchy when applied to a company. If the company has masterminded the illegal installation of software (i.e., they told the employees to do it), they will most likely be held liable. If an employee illegally installs software on a company computer, the installer will be held liable, but the company might also be held liable, depending on the circumstances and the degree to which the company was involved. The court sentence varies, but in the U.S. it is a maximum of 5 years in prison and/or a $250,000 fine. However, the maximum sentence is usually only used in repeated offenses and extreme first offenses.
The driver who hit the pedestrian is liable, not their insurance company. The drivers insurance company will normally be responsible for payment of valid claims up to the policy limits for which the their insured driver is found liable.
No , if an employee has committed fraud and signed a contract under the company knowingly unauthorized then the company may not held liable.
The term severally liable means that a person, company, or place is responsible for the upkeep of an establishment, property, or service. If the person, company, or place is not following the responsibilities they are liable which means they can be sued for money.
The owner of the car is liable for the accident itself and the damage. However, the insurance company might have to pay for it, depending on the owners insurance cover.
If you only carry liability insurance, that is all that the insurance company is liable for in this state.
It's an endorsement that makes the employer liable for an independent contractor's employees.