Question is unspecific to give a sepcific answer. Assuming it is in situations where resources are limited there will be a short supply of educational services: high teacher student ratio, cramming of schools etc. However, if there is reasonable access to educational institutions, it can also work as a self-supporting initiative. It can generate resources leading to efficient use. Also creates pressure for good education. It also has a lot to do with the distribution of population - how sparse is it. Too sparse and too high is problamatic from delivery point of view but providing employment is a key challenge in such a situation. Coupled with poor quality education with unemployment is the recipe for social strife.
Im the best! booyah! haha
The population of an area and it's education are fairly intertwined. The more population, the higher the class size, and the "worse" student-teacher ratio. When there are more students, the single teacher can not teach or help a student one on one, since there are so many children in that class. This can have an effect on test scores and achievement in the long run.
Most likely it does, high school provides a lot of education.
population growth
Well you don't get your full education
indias education level is high they get 8 years of education of primsry and 99% of the population knows how to read and wrire.
education and housing does not effect each other. education does not effect housing and housing does not effect education.
The population of Pearson Education is 40,000.
Woman who have a better education want to have their children later on in life, sometimes not even having any children at all. Education can stop woman from having children. Causing the population to go down, or stay the same.
Father of population education is sloan r.wayland. He coined population education in 1969 ad.
Landmark Education's population is 800.
Bridgepoint Education's population is 2,010.
The population of Mosaica Education is 1,800.