I've never heard of primary vs. secondary sources ofreading, but I can provide an answer on primary vs. secondary sources of data.
A secondary source of data is data that was collected for a reason other than the task at hand. A good example is US Census data. Marketers might use census data as input into decisions. An example of application of this data is as follows. Suppose you want to distribute your product in the 5 most populated cities in the US. You could find this info from census data, and go about distributing your product in those 5 cities.
A primary source of data is data that is collected specifically for the task at hand, often via a market research study. For example, if you wanted to know what features of your product are most valued to buyers, you would design a market research study (i.e. questionnaire) to find that out. At the end of your study, you'd have the data to answer your question.
---
Note that there is quite a trade in used data. There's nothing wrong in this, provided all the relevant information about things like the purpose and reliability and possible sources of distortion of the old data are taken into account.
Simply put, the result of reading something is knowing what it says. The result of studying something is understanding what it means. With secular literature, casual reading often results in understanding because the information is right on the surface. This is not so with the Bible, in which the spiritual concepts run far deeper than a casual reading will reveal.
the answer to that is 2.5
the time between one reading bieng taken and the next reading being taken
That would depend quite heavily on what it is that you're reading.
The exact mileage per year is the odometer reading at the end of the year minus the odometer reading at the beginning of the year. If you don't have the odometer reading from the beginning of the year, the next best thing is to subtract an older odometer reading from the reading at the beginning of the year, then divide the difference by the number of years between readings. Without any odometer readings from the past, the best you can do is to calculate the average annual mileage over the life of the truck, which is the current odometer reading divided by the truck's years of service.
The primary audience refers to the main group of individuals for whom a piece of writing is intended, while the secondary audience includes additional or unintended readers who may come across the material. The primary audience is the central focus of the message, while the secondary audience receives it indirectly.
a primary instrument takes a reading value and sends a signal to a secondary instrument that will control the value of the primary reading.
There is no difference.
Yes, a commentary is a secondary source. A primary source is a first hand account of an event. I.e. I was at the corner when a five car pile up happened. When the police question me, the account I give them is a primary source.A secondary source is an after-the-fact account of events gathered from a primary source. A commentary is derived after reading a written article or watching a film, this the commentators commentary is secondary to what they were watching, reading, or listening too.
Reading for literature involves analyzing themes, symbolism, and style to gain a deeper understanding of a text's artistic qualities, while reading for information focuses on obtaining specific facts or knowledge from a text. Literary reading often involves interpretation and subjective analysis, whereas informational reading aims to gather objective data or details.
I believe that it is located beneath the covert feathers and behind the primary feathers. Thanks for reading! ;)
What is the difference between reading-in and reading-down?
If you are reading the actual letter, or an exact quote from that letter, it is a primary source.
well, primary source is when you find something, by not using any evidence the man was reading a newspaper. secondary is when you find information from the primary source. the man found a newspaper add for a gardener. . . sorry it hard to explain xxx or...
no
guess what? i don't know.
i dotn no