I went through ur view,,but i found you a person who is motivated by politics.i have some benefits about this deal.. 1.after 40 yrs,when uranium will be consumed totally from the world,then this deal will have no value. 2. you mentioned about India-china relation.did u forget the war,did u forget the arunachal and sikkim issue?? 3.now global issue...china and Russia are close friends..the friendship between china and USA, we see now a days, is just a white lie to the world community. USA and china and Russia know it well.during indo-Chinese war Russia avoided us by saying "India is our good friend but Chinese are our brother" .the only country helped us was America.. 4.we know these renewable sources can fulfill our requirements,but if there is nuclear energy then it is an added advantage.. 5.if in future America closes the deal,then we have our hydro electricity,solar,wind power..if we see any violation in our sovereignty,then we can close the deal immediately...from now we have to invest more in solar,hydro and wind power. 6.again,just think why America choosed India for it,not china or Pakistan????? 7.a lots of Indians probably the largest in USA are living and also in UK...it brings a kind of good relationship with those countries.those NRIS invest a lot in our country. 8.our outsourcing industry depends fully on them.doesn't depend upon china and Pakistan.. 9.after 9/11,America has understood Pakistan as a migraine and now has tightened its jaws... 10.why china reacted a lot after this deal????is there any answer of this?? 11.lastly,if u think than America fears India and that's why it is trying to bring India under its control,then u r totally wrong..USA is more than 3 times of India,12 times more in economy and a technical power..we can never catch in power or economy because size matters...so,better make USA and UK as our friend,forget about china-India relation.
it is mutual co-operation between both country. or a agrrement in which us will supply n-power to develop our systems.
Please state which deal you are referring to
Passed by the Senate on October 1st 2008
Pros: your children (should) have a better life Cons: their will be discrimination as stated in the movie
I have two pros and two cons:PROSresourceswe'll have more peole to fight in warsCONSlanguage, culture and religion will change because there are more people in India than Bangladesh so India will obviously rule over Bangladesh.the relationship between Bangladesh and Pakistan will not exist because Pakistan is India's enemy so it will become Bangladesh's enemy as well.
Cons.
PROS: Products were now made much faster CONS: Bad Pollution, working conditions were horrible,
Cons of directing: -paparatzie -dont get paid much when movies fail -critics can be mean -actresses and actors can be bratty -stressful
There are no pros or cons of nuclear fission, it simply IS. Nuclear fission is a natural phenomena that has always existed, no matter how much one likes or dislikes it.However there are pros and cons to how humans choose to use or not use nuclear fission; the technologies we choose to build with it.
By 'devices' do you mean nuclear weapons, or peaceful uses of nuclear power?
Nuclear energy ! pros- causes almost no green house gasses, & pollution. cons-can cause melt downs.
THAT I DO NOT KNOW
Nuclear weapons are extremely dangerous but there are pros and cons to the use of these weapons. The pros are that it can be the answer to terrorism as these can wipe out entire cities or countries. The cons are that these weapons are highly immoral and dangerous and the effects can last for decades.
Uranium is toxic, radioactive, can be used for nuclear weapons.
Pros: tremendously powerful, heavily impacts enemy morale Cons: nuclear fallout, extremely negative reaction by foreign countries towards the user, initiates the possibility of mutually assured destruction.
The pros of decentralized government is power, pay and benefits. The cons for having this job is safety, hours and work.
Pro- Lots of energy Con- Hard to contain
Plutonium is very important for nuclear weapons and for nuclear fuels used in nuclear reactors. But plutonium is also toxic and radioactive. See the link below.
there are pros and cons for using nuclear power (as with all power sources). pros of using nuclear power are: it can produce at lot more power than a combustion reaction can e.g burning coal, uranium and plutonium (used in the reactors of nuclear power stations) is fairly cheap. cons of using of using nuclear power include: the waste products of nuclear reactions are incredibly dangerous and take thousands of years to become un-reactive, nuclear power stations also have hefty maintenance requirements, cost a lot to build and don't last as long as more conventional power stations. So to address your question- people are divided over whether the pros of nuclear power outweigh the cons. it may be realistic to nuclear power, however it is very unlikely that it will be the world's main power source.
There are many pros and cons on this issue. Are you a proor a con? We're looking for someone to speak for the benefits because we have someone to speak for the deficits.