Judicial independence is when a separation of the powers exists between the judicial branch of government and legislative and executive branches of government. The executive and legislative branches are unable to control or influence judges' decisions in any way and cannot have an impact upon their decisions or threaten to sack them if they make the 'wrong' decision. This should not be confused with judicial neutrality, which is when no member of government or the public is able to put pressure on judges to come to a decision which they would not normally reach, or otherwise upset the judge so that he/she cannot make up their minds with complete impartiality.
An independent judiciary is one whose functions are not regulated directly by another branch of government, i.e. it cannot be directly controlled or overruled by some other governmental power. In the system of checks and balances, the judiciary branch (courts) act as a check on the powers of the legislative and executive branches, although judges may be appointed by the executive and/or confirmed by the legislature.
In the US, the independent judiciary is necessary.
Yes, India have a independent judiciary.
The independent of judiciary is the concept that the judiciary needs to be kept away from the other branches of government. It is vital and independent to the idea of separation of powers.
It has an independent judiciary.
yes as india's salient feature is to be independent
Independent judiciary was a fledgling idea in Medieval Europe. ?æWith the establishment of Habeas Corpus and the Magna Carta, the foundation was established for courts to be a separate entity.
YES , division of powers and independent judiciary the two important features of federal form of government
both have an independent judiciary
It has a bicameral Legislature, an Independent Judiciary and a strong Executive.
yes
South Dakota's governmental structure is based on that of the Federal Government. South Dakota has a bicameral legislature, an independent judiciary and a strong executive branch.
Yes it was. By any definition, Hitler was a 'tyrant', and Germany had no independent or even functioning Parliament and no independent Judiciary anymore.