Taxes are (supposed to be) used towards the public good, to provide services that no one besides government is going to provide because it simply is not profitable. A good example is roads. If the government did not use tax money to build roads, no one else would because there is no profit in it.
The idea that taxation should be based on the ability-to-pay principle
Sven Steinmo has written: 'Taxation and Democracy' -- subject(s): Taxation 'Growing Apart?'
no taxation
No taxation without input from those being taxed
Steven Porter has written: 'America's dying democracy' -- subject(s): Political corruption, Democracy 'Restoring the Foundations of Epistemic Justification' 'The American musical theatre' -- subject(s): Musicals, Production and direction
BIG BOYYY
Ordered,limited and representative government
Kinn Wei Shaw has written: 'Democracy and finance in China' -- subject(s): Finance and taxation
Jingwei Shou has written: 'Democracy and finance in China' -- subject(s): Finance, Public, Public Finance, Taxation
Do you have the justification to ask that question? What is your justification for asking that question? There is a lot of justification for asking that question.
Robert La Follette expanded democracy by championing the "Wisconsin idea" which pioneered Workmen's Compensation and minimum wage legislation. He pushed forward corporate and railroad regulations along with progressive taxation. He favored an expanded political democracy to allow people to move toward economic democracy.
The adjective of justification is justifiable.The adverb of justification is justifiably.