not much. as the common was already protecting the rights of the people. the Act just made it binding on both judiciary and the parliament and also the government .
They used the doctrine of natural rights built on the concept of "fundamental fairness."
what is public rights doctrin
The doctrine of judicial precedent* refers to the process by which judges follow previously decided cases. Courts at the top of the hierarchy are of more significance so their decisions carry greater legal weight than lower or inferior court decisions. In the UK, the House of Lords binds lower courts, but not itself. Even though its ability to depart from previous decisions is wide it uses this power with great discretion, following guidelines laid out in the Practice Statement Judicial Precedent of 1966. *Another name of the doctrine is "stare decisis". ("Stare" is pronounced "starry" or "staray"; decisis rhymes with crisis with the "c" pronounced as an "s".) It is Latin for "the decision stands".
1828
Lawrence v. Texas was the landmark case that set a precedent or standard for identifying a class of fundamental personal rights.
1828
Doctrine, philosophy
N
No documents gave rights to the citizens because they did not have a written constitution. Instead, they relied on "the way of the elders," or ancestral custom and precedent. This situation is similar to the common law of England. Therefore, the rights of citizens were written in several separate pieces of legislation.
The doctrine of judicial precedent is at the heart of the Common Law system of rights and duties. The courts are bound (within prescribed limits) by prior decisions of superior courts. Adherence to precedent helps achieve two objects of the legal order. Firstly it contributes to the maintenance of a regime of stable laws. This stability gives predictability to the law and affords a degree of security for individual rights. Secondly it ensures that the law develops only in accordance with the changing perceptions of the community and therefore more accurately reflects the morals and expectations of the community.
After WWI, they lost the rights, when they got marriage. Under the common law doctrine of coverture husbands gained control of their wives' real estate and wages.
no