The Big Bang Theory implies that everything in our current Universe was contained as energy in a "Primordial Seed." that was smaller then an atom. Where this "seed" came from is not in the realm of science, as anyone can appreciate, and no one has been able to answer this without incurring the religious concept of a Omnipotent God. This incredibly small "seed" ruptured about 13.7 billion years ago. (Determined from WMAP microwave background radiation satellite) From it sprung forth the Universe which has evolved during that time into what we see today. Remember that mass is "frozen energy." So that we are not imagining that all this solid mass we see today was all squished into this little particle. Then imagine if it was the ultimate explosion, and everything shot out in all directions, what would we see today, so many billions of years later. Well we would see everything that is anything in the Universe speeding away from just about everything else. Knowing this, Edmund Hubble an astronomer in the 1920's discovered a unique property of the spectra of Galaxies he photographed over the course of years with the 100 inch Mt Palomar Telescope which was the most powerful telescope of its time.
Spectra of the light from stars and even galaxies can reveal an incredible amount of information about its composition, and in our case it speed and direction. The light coming into the telescope reveals that there are spectral lines that normally would be located in predetermined places for the components that compose the galaxy or star being measured. Hubble found that these spectral lines were displaced in one direction or another. One end of the spectra is the red end or long wave length. While the other end of the spectra is the shorter wave length or blue end. His genius was to realize that if light travels through space toward you it is traveling in such a way as to compress the light waves making them shorter or bluer. If light is traveling through space away from you the light waves are stretched making them longer or redder. This is the famed redshift. When seen from earth almost 99% of every galaxy with measured spectra has a red shift which indicates everything is rushing away from us. Which is a very good proof that a long long time ago (13.7 billion years) everything started from the same point, and is now rushing away from that point.
How fast something is traveling away from us determines how far the spectral lines are displace away from their usual placement. Some of the most distant galaxies are speeding away from us at close to the speed of light. This is not that these galaxies are traveling through space at that speed. If that were the situation these galaxies would be subject to the Einsteinian limits of travel through space. Therefore, it is that the space they are contained in that is expanding at that rate.
Space can expand faster then the speed of light. It is thought it happened in the initial expansion of the "primordial seed" that expanded during the Big Bang. The energy released was sufficient to expand that small seed from the size of an atom to the size of a Basketball in an infinitely small portion of a second which is many times faster then the speed of light, this is known as inflation and is a critical part of the current Big Bang Theory to make it work.
It doesn't. Evolutionists say that the best explanation is that the x-rays are resonating from the big bang, but there is absolutely no proof for that statement. the radiation could come from anywhere in the universe. Gases circling black holes give of large amounts of radiation, and many stars also give off radiation.
Theoretically yes. String theory and M theory says that when the two universe collide together or split into two universes, that is when Big Bang occurs. However there is no evidence that Parallel universe exists.
If your issues are on the table, then it would be apparent that empirical evidence would trump theory, if the theory on the table were not proven to be true. If the theory were proven to be true, and the empirical evidence does not agree with the theory, then more experimentation would be necessary to determine the validity of the theory.
There is no scientific question that the known universe came into existence at the time and in the manner typically described as the Big Bang. All available evidence is consisten with the theory.
The Big Bang Theory is the name given to the theory of cosmic expansion. The idea is of an ever expanding universe. It posits that at some point all matter in the universe was contained within one point.
1.Helium burning in stars. 2.Hydrogen burning in stars. 3.Big bang theory
The significance of the Higgs particle is that it is deemed to have created the universe we live in with the Big Bang Theory. It is said to give validity to the Standard Model of Physics.
This question is simply too general, but i'll give you the definition and an example of the geological evidence of Pangaea.Definition: evidence that geologically prove the existant of such theory inrelation to being of the past (on most occaisions)A geological example of evidence of the existant of Pangaea is how there are coal mines in Antarctica. Coal mines only form near the equator, therefore proving that continental shift was involved and that there was once a "Pangaea".
As of 05|2013, the end of the 6th Season, the writers apparently haven't deemed it necessary to give her one, simple as that.
I truly don't understand this question. Could you just give me a right answer.
The wavelength of light emitted by a moving object is shifted. To get it really right, you should understand the Special Theory of Relativity.
The Big Bang did not give us visible light. Light, from the time of the Big Bang has been red shifted so that it is now in the microwave part of the spectrum.However, the Big Bang did give us all the matter that exists, and some of that matter formed stars which, in their nuclear fusion, produce light.