The "big bang" predated the Earth by about 8 billion years.
The biggest bang that the Earth had was with a sister planet about 4.7 billion years ago which resulted in the formation of the moon (and the rotation of the Earth - i.e. day and night).
Not at the present time, just like scientists haven't yet figured out why there is lightning in our skies. The idea that our Universe has been expanding at a (more or less) steady rate for the last 13.7 billion years, is just as proven as the idea that our Earth goes around our Sun. However, as Alan Guth said so well: "The Big Bang theory says nothing about what banged, why it banged, or what happened before it banged."
yes
The Big Bang is a theory of what happened at the beginning of the universe. Astronomy and physics have shown that the universe did actually have a beginning, but we're not exactly sure of the origins of the Big Bang. There is a fortune and a Nobel Prize waiting for the first person to answer this question to everyones satisfaction. the-pokedex:well this came to me one day but it is correct that the sun was getting to much energy so it blow up then the paticals of water came to the lava making rock and then the little rocks came to the main rock or the biggest making planets PS i am only 9
According to the believes of physics and the big bang, we know that the big bang was both big and a bang. Since we are still receiving radiation from the big bang, So considering that factor I would say that it was big and a bang. What do you believe?
It's usually banged on a circular piece of polished wood - called a sound block.
Please note this succint quote from Alan Guth: "The Big Bang theory says nothing about what banged, why it banged, or what happened before it banged." So, although Big Bang Cosmology is the only idea that explains certain undeniable facts about our Universe, it does not explain -- indeed, it doesn't even TRY to explain -- the origin of our Universe.
To bang has the past tense "banged" (He banged his knee on the door yesterday.)
The past participle of "bang" is "banged".
One of it is the Big Bang Theory.
the big bang is a theory. scientists believe that there was an explosion and now it keeps expanding. the world is 14.7 billion years old. the big bang isn't true because God created the world.
Yes, it is the past tense of the verb "to bang." The similar adjective is "banged up."
Verbs do not have passive forms, verbs combine with beverbs to formpassive verb phrases. Passive verb phrases are formed with - be + past participle.For bang the past participle is banged so a passive verb phrase could be - is banged, are banged, was banged, were banging, was being banged.
Just after I banged OP's mom.
Not at the present time, just like scientists haven't yet figured out why there is lightning in our skies. The idea that our Universe has been expanding at a (more or less) steady rate for the last 13.7 billion years, is just as proven as the idea that our Earth goes around our Sun. However, as Alan Guth said so well: "The Big Bang theory says nothing about what banged, why it banged, or what happened before it banged."
yes
The Big Bang is a theory of what happened at the beginning of the universe. Astronomy and physics have shown that the universe did actually have a beginning, but we're not exactly sure of the origins of the Big Bang. There is a fortune and a Nobel Prize waiting for the first person to answer this question to everyones satisfaction. the-pokedex:well this came to me one day but it is correct that the sun was getting to much energy so it blow up then the paticals of water came to the lava making rock and then the little rocks came to the main rock or the biggest making planets PS i am only 9
The past participle is banged. The present participle is banging.