the Persian empire was much bigger and a lot more powerful.
The Persian Empire.
good roads, postal service,uniform law
They established the empire by expansion, and settled its structure of governance and civilisation.
The Mughals were descended from Mongols and Turks and were Muslims, dominant in the 1600s and 1700s. The Mauryans were Hindus/Buddhists much much earlier.
There are many differences. One key difference is Religion where the Mauryans followed Buddhism and the Gupta Empire followed Hinduism. Other differences are from how each empire collapsed. The Mauryan Empire collapsed due to dynastic siputes and invasions. The Gupta Empire collapsed because of the corrupt governors, little central control, and pressure from the huns.
By allowing local government to continue, with Persian provincial governors to ensure internal peace and provide external security, under the supervision of the king and his council.
of course chandragupta maurya is the strongest king of all mauryans...as he was the 'one man army' nd established the largest empire in the history of india...
One of the differences is that the US is not an empire, it is a country. An empire is a region ruled by an emperor. The US doesn't have an emperor. Yet.
Darius revolutionized the economy by placing it on a silver/gold coinage system. Trade was extensive, and under the Achaemenids there was an efficient infrastructure that facilitated the exchange of commodities among the far reaches of the empire.
Yes. The first Achaemenid ruler was Cyrus II (The Great), who founded the Persian Empire by uniting the two original Iranian tribes, the Medes and the Persians in the 6th century BC.
The Britsh Empire was - relatively speaking and only in comparison with other colonial Empires - the largest Empire in the world, between 1895 and 1948. But that did not mean that it ruled over the majority of all the territory in the world.
The City of London was a part of both the Roman Empire and modern Europe