From 1937 to 1966 inclusive, British Shilling coins were minted with one of two different reverse designs.
Shillings with what is known as the "English" reverse, shows the English Coat of Arms which depicts three lions (which are actually leopards).
Shillings with what is known as the "Scottish" reverse, shows the Scottish Coat of Arms which depicts a lion rampant.
Both Coats of Arms are "Crowned".
The plural of "coat of arms" is "coats of arms".
Coats of arms do not themselves have surnames.
Coats of Arms belong to individuals, not to families.
http://estrada.bz/heraldry.htm
The College of Arms is the official repository of the Coats of Arms of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Commonwealth. Other nations have similar organizations. Coats of Arms are authorized by senior Heralds on letters patent. A Coat of Arms with royal connection may carry elements of the royal coat of arms within it. There are several websites which list coats of arms, families and their connections; DeBretts being a good example.
One Shilling coins were potentially minted by most of the British Empire/Commonwealth countries having their own currencies based on the British Imperial currency system in 1927. The 1927 Australian Shilling has the Australian Coat of Arms on the reverse. If you look at the teeny tiny printing in the scroll at the bottom of the Coat of Arms, you will see "ADVANCE AUSTRALIA". All Australian coins have "AUSTRALIA" on them somewhere. The 1927 British Shilling shows a lion rampant on a crown on the reverse. British coins are almost unique in the world by never having the country name on them.
The design of the British one pound coin changes every few years, and many of the designs have been coats of arms, including the Royal Coat of Arms and the coats of arms of various cities in the UK (Belfast, Edinburgh London, etc.)
Colors and animals were, and are, used in coats of arms because they are used a symbols.
The plural of "coat of arms" is "coats of arms".
Coats of arms were used to identify individuals of high status on the battle field when they were otherwise unrecognizable in their armor.
Coats of arms do not themselves have surnames.
In the Middle Ages, coats of arms were used exclusively by the nobility on flags and armour. Fishermen would not have coats of arms.
Names do not have crests or coats of arms. Some individuals have coats of arms. Some families have crests; and some families of the same name do not.
heardly is the anwser
Coats of Arms belong to individuals, not to families.
Coats of arms generally follow the rules of Heraldry.
Heraldry.