Lamarck knew evolution was happening, his inaccuracies are in how he explained it.
The first part of his theory is known as "use it or lose it" today. He said that use makes organs and structures bigger or more useful. Giraffes needed long necks, while blind cave fish lost their eyes. Darwin thought this idea was too simple, and replaced it with natural and sexual selection.
The second major point Lamarck made was called acquired inherited traits. This means that traits that an organisms gets after it was born affects its offspring. This would mean that a bodybuilder would naturally get buff children, and that crabs that lost their claws would have clawless spawn. A famous experiment involving the mutilation of mice (which left their offspring unaffected) disproved this.
Because of our knowledge of genetics, we say that variation is caused by mutations and not acquired traits.
The idea of acquired characteristics. For instance. The idea that a blacksmith, who would develop enormous muscles due to his trade, could pass these physical attributes on to his children.
rejected.
There are a great many places where he could get his ideas. He could get his ideas from magazines and stories for example.
His ideas basically opposed the ideas of God and the creator; some people liked his ideas and some people hated them with cold-blood.
early 1800s
The idea of acquired characteristics. For instance. The idea that a blacksmith, who would develop enormous muscles due to his trade, could pass these physical attributes on to his children.
rejected.
Animal behaviors are not inheritable.
Make me cum daddy~! Make me moan~!
he was different because lamarck was using already true things to prove something and wallace was a theorist
Lamark believed that behaviors learned by parents could become inheritable traits.
he was different because lamarck was using already true things to prove something and wallace was a theorist
if I were to inherit traits based on Lamarcks explanation of evolution were correct we wouldn't be the people we are now. Lamarcks´ explanation was that acquired characteristics were genetically passed to the offspring so if that were so, the human brains would be much more developed, more knowledge, and bigger parts of the body. This question is also tricky since a human would turn out to be a giant by the time they got to the 100th offspring
Beginning in 1801, Lamarck began to publish details of his evolutionary theories. Where others in the field had hinted at the possibility of evolutionary change, Lamarck declared it as being a truth and fact.
No. While initial ideas are ideas one first thinks of and can become primary ideas (or, in other words, the main focus), primary ideas are not necessarily the first ideas one thinks of (better known as initial ideas). Initial ideas can become primary ideas. Primary ideas are not necessarily initial ideas.
Weismann started an experiment, where he cut off tails on many mice, and let them live like that. When they had offspring, their offspring had tails, proving that traits that are altered during a life-span, don't get passed on to the next generation
youtube ideas are video ideas