Yes First off your question is not stated properly; the South did secede successfully from the Union, though they were never recognized as an independent country by other European countries.
But answer to was it "right" for them to secede is the same answer you get when asking if it was "right" for people to leave Britain in search of a new land. Absolutely. The South seceded because of the oppressive government of the United States and the laws regulating state's rights to choose.
To my understanding the South did not have the right to secede from the Union. According to Section 10 of the US Constitution, No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation.
To the North there was no question that the South's secession was due to them losing the national election to the Republican Party who was well known to be an anti-slavery Party. Abraham Lincoln promised he would only stop the expansion of slavery which he proved to be true throughout the war, except when he passed the Emancipation Proclamation.
To my understanding the South did not have the right to secede from the Union. According to Section 10 of the US Constitution, No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation.
To the North there was no question that the South's secession was due to them losing the national election to the Republican Party who was well known to be an anti-slavery Party. Abraham Lincoln promised he would only stop the expansion of slavery which he proved to be true throughout the war, except when he passed the Emancipation Proclamation.
To provoke the CSA to start the war and try to reunite the country.
South Carolina is a right to work state. This is an incentive for industries to move there. A right to work state means that an employee of a company does not have to join a union associated with that company. With that said, many unions will not try to organize an union in an unfriendly company.
Yes, it was one of the first to follow South Carolina in seceding from the Union.
Several New England states attempted to secede as late as 1856. Maine was at the center of the movement. I'm not sure about New Jersey.
It attacked Fort Sumter in South Carolina.
Mexico
actually it's the south that tried to secede from the Union to become the Confederacy!because of slavery, the south depended heavily on slave labor as their economy was more agrarian, while the north was more industrial and intellectual in nature, and thus were more abolitionist.Another View: The Civil War was NOT fought as a slavery issue until much later in the war. It was basically an economic struggle over the balance of power of representation in Congress between the so-called slave-states (who had primarily an agricultural economy) and the so-called free-states (who were basically centered on an industrial economy).
The British feared losing Union grain shipments.
To try and convince the southern states who had not yet seceded from the Union but were threatening to do so, to not secede, as well as, focus on protecting the Government's property and assets, against those states which had seceded from the Union.
The Union was fighting to end slavery and the South was fighting to keep it's slaves. Britain outlawed slavery.
The Union had a much larger warship fleet than the South did. In addition to that, the Union had safe shipyards far from the South that built many types of ships during the US Civil War. With this naval advantage, the Union was to a large degree successful in blockading Southern ports.
They wanted to try to reunite with the South while still abolishing slavery.