Article 92, UCMJ. It's an orders violation. Each service has written orders against fraternization.
115
134
Article 134
TYpically unprofessional relationships are prosecuted under Article 92, as violation of the Service regulations on fraternization.
The same as any charge made under the UCMJ, the burden of proof is upon the accused. Should you be accused of fraternization by a military authority, it will be necessary for you to prove your innocence.
What article of the UCMJ covers fraternization
115
134
Article 134
TYpically unprofessional relationships are prosecuted under Article 92, as violation of the Service regulations on fraternization.
The same as any charge made under the UCMJ, the burden of proof is upon the accused. Should you be accused of fraternization by a military authority, it will be necessary for you to prove your innocence.
You can find that under article 134. UCMJ Fraternization policies do not apply to people in the Individual Ready Reserves. Those rules are mostly for active duty enlisted and officers. It is found in Article 92, UCMJ, and fraternization is prosecuted or dealt with as an orders violation. The fraternization rules apply to the Reserves and National Guard. Those in the IRR are not generally considered to be covered by the fraternization rules unless they are put in a recall or AT or similar duty. This is to prevent officers from getting involved with enlisted in their chain of command. It is also intended to prohibit certain relationships between enlisted personnel who are in each others chain of command and between officers in the same chain of command.
This offense falls under the Punitive Articles of the Uniform Code of Military Jurisdiction (UCMJ), specifically the General Article, #134.
It is a violation of Article 134 of the UCMJ.
Sexual harassment is not covered by a specific article of the UCMJ. DoD and each service, and even each command have published sexual harrassment policies. Violation of this policy could result in charges being brought under several articles of the UCMJ: Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation), Article 128 (Assault) if any assault was involved in the violation, Article 134 (General Article) which can capture numerous violations including conduct unbecoming, adultry and other inappropriate behavior not covered by another article, Article 120 (Rape), and I'm sure there are others. These are just a few examples. Bottom line, sexual harrassment is a policy which is not directly covered by a UCMJ article when violated.
The simple answer is yes. Under the UCMJ, Article 134 is the General Article that could be used.
Article 92, UCMJ. There are two types of dereliction: wilful and negligent punished under the same article. Note sometimes they also charge an orders violation, also under Article 92 for the same or similar conduct.