It's funny I have this same question in my International Business class. It's too bad that some people can't think for themselves, and have to resort to this type of cheating. Really...it seems you've been here yourself!
This law promoted competition. It didn't allow companies to work together to avoid competing. It made top company managers personally responsible if their companies broke antitrust laws.
they were competing about money(economics), navies, armies, amount of resources, etc
A constitution accommodates demands of competing nationalities in a state.
205
There are various competing defintions.
Some governments and kings had difficulty agreeing to fund explorations because of the high costs involved, the risks associated with uncertain outcomes, and concerns about potential failures leading to wasted resources. Additionally, competing priorities for resources such as investing in military, infrastructure, or internal stability could make it challenging to prioritize funding for exploration.
coke and pepsi
Probably Insurance companies because they're always competing, other companies that advertise a lot are Car companies, and Cell phone carriers, again, because they're always competing.
greed
interlocking directorates :)
No, the are completelyseparate,competing companies.
They are regulated because the government wants to know what these companies are doing and there are no competing companies for electric services.
No, they are two completely separate and competing oil companies.
No. Coca Cola and Pepsico are different, and competing, companies.
Sony(Ps3, PsP,Ps2) and Microsoft(Xbox360)
The corporate culture of nestle is to succeed at competing with similar companies.
Interlocking Directorate