0
Yes, some endangered animals have been saved by staying in a zoo and being bred so the population is larger. Also, they need to be helped if they have serious injuries they can be helped and eventually put back into the wild. This can also help them from being attacked or shot by hunters.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoYes. Keeping the animals in a zoo is what keeps many species from extinction. It is wrong to keep animals in bad zoos, but good ones are far better for some than being out in the wild.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoYes, but elephants walk around 30 miles a day out in the wild but in the zoo's they are kept in small confined areas. It is also good because the conserve some animals and are scientifically proven to live longer in zoo's. Either way its kind of the same, there are good reasons but they're are also bad in ways also.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoyes they are giving shelter,food and saftey so if not zoos just need to be improved:)
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoAnimals should be kept in zoos because they get trained more better and get more tamed, they get treated well and also looked after.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agono animals should not be kept in zoos because they deserve to be free as us humans.
Wiki User
∙ 14y agono
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Pros and cons keeping wild animals at home essays?
There are no good reasons to keep a wild animal in your home. Wild animals are not made to live in captivity and should be allowed to live in their natural habitat.
Why should children not go the zoo?
Because it encourages people to keep animals in captivity, against their will, when they should be in their natural habitat. We should learn about animals by visiting them in the wild or through reading books and watching documentaries.
Should are state be allowed to keep wild animals?
No it shouldn't. Animals should roam free. Not be cooped up in peoples homes even as a baby.
Do you need a license to keep a frog?
yes as keeping frogs in captivity is classed as cruelty to animals
Animals should not be used for drug development or medical research?
Animals should not be used for drug development or medical research for the following reasons: Animals are killed and kept in captivity for the extent of their lives. A lot of the things tested on animals are never even used. It is expensive to keep animals alive for the sole purpose of testing drugs and other devices on them. Animals and humans are not the same.
Why is it wrong to keep a tiger in captivity?
THEY CERTAINLY SHOULD NOT BE!!!do not delete answers, just add on please.i think tigers should be kept in captivity because they have a safe place to live and have few to none risk's of being harmed. they get supplied water, food, and the love from the zoo keeper's or nature preserves they live in. therefor, i think tigers SHOULD be kept in captivity. my theory has come to a end.
Is it right to keep Ligers in captivity?
Yes. Ligers only exist in captivity.
When will member animals be allowed with nonmembers on animal jam?
It depends keep ur fingers crossed
Why may animals reproduce better in a captive breeding program than in the wild?
They live longer in captivity because there are no predators to hurt, kill, or get them infected with a disease or a flesh wound. The animals in captivity also get fed on a regular basis and keep them healthy. They also get watched by doctors to see if they are sick or not.
Can you save endangered animals?
Of course you can! Just keep the environment clean..... Clean beaches lakes, etc. ~Carson Searcy~
Should people keep wild animals as pets when tamed and cleanced?
No. Animals belong in the wild. That is their home and that is where they should stay.
Should an animal abuser be able to keep their animal?
That's like asking "Should a child abuser be allowed to keep custody of their child?"
