No
It is not a grammatically correct sentence, if that's what you mean. You should change "lie" to "lies", or to "lied", depending on what you wanted to say.
An astronaut is a commander, pilot, or a crew member of a spacecraft. In Russia an astronaut is known as a cosmonaut.
The mountain was too distant to be reached on foot in a single day. The distant planet Neptune was studied by the spacecraft Voyager 1. Her husband seemed distant now, and paid little attention to her.
Example sentence - The pilot of a balloon is called an aeronaut.
I can give you a sentence using the word galaxy.
This sentence is not grammatically correct. For the sentence to be grammatically correct, the space between "in" and "to" would have to be removed. Therefore the sentence should read "They are into skating."
"That was wrong" is a grammatically correct sentence.
The sentence is grammatically correct.
An example of a sentence with the word bonanza would be: There was a bonanza of letters in my mailbox. Bonanza means plentiful or a lot of. Therefor, substituting the definition for bonanza would make the sentence look like this: There was a lot of letters in my mailbox. Both sentences are grammatically correct and make sense.
Yes. Strictly speaking For example at the beginning of a sentence is what is called an "absolute," grammatically unconnected to the rest of the sentence.
Yes, it is grammatically correct.
'Rhoda's crazy' is grammatically correct.
'What a drunkard you are' is a grammatically correct English sentence.
No it should be "You were not there"...
This sentence is grammatically correct.
That sentence is grammatically correct.
This sentence is grammatically correct.