No. Not unless one is expressed in the court order that created the easement. You need to review that order.
It means that you can refile the case, as long as you are still within the statue of limitations. If you are outside of the statue of limitations, you still may be able to refile if the defendant mislead you on your right to reopen while you were within the statute of limitations. If you were misled on your rights to reopen you can assert estoppel against defendant from applying the statute of limitations.
Statutes of Limitations do not apply to this circumstance. However, "right to a speedy trial" does apply. It may not affect the charges against you but it can become a constitutional issue. If it has been more than 90 days since you were first presented to the court, either contact the court or your attorney for guidance.
There is no "statute of limitations" on a convicted felons right to own or possess firearms. Unless the conviction is expunged it is prohibited - forever - under both state and federal law.
If you have been charged, the statute of limitations does not apply. The intent is to prevent someone from charging you suddenly years later. You may have recourse to issues with your right to a speedy trial.
A letter or intent to file suit is a notification that you are intending to sue. The statute of limitations on the suit begins the moment a known legal right to sue becomes evident. The statute of limitations and the letter may have different dates assigned to them. If they match, the answer is no.
If the statute of limitations has expired, the collection agency is just blowing smoke. Tell them that you know the statute of limitations has expired and they have no right to harass you.
A letter or intent to file suit is a notification that you are intending to sue. The statute of limitations on the suit begins the moment a known legal right to sue becomes evident. The statute of limitations and the letter may have different dates assigned to them. If they match, the answer is no.
No. The statutes of limitations limit the states right to prosecute an individual (if they are unknown and un-named) - whereas the right to a speedy trial takes effect and begins upon the defendants initial charge in court (usually 90 days, unless an extension is agreed to by the defendant). Re: SOL's - - not all offenses are covered - some offenses have no SOL.
Yes, in fact an obstruction to a right of way MUST be removed as it is a trespass on the right, and failure to take action to have it removed will start the statute of limitations (trespass), after which the right is lost.
You have to prosecute theft within 3 years in Oregon. You cannot prosecute theft after this time. Sometimes theft isn't discovered right away.
Once the ticket has been issued, they can set it at any time. You could argue that your right to a speedy trial has been violated, but once the ticket is out there, you have been given notice and no SOL applies.
Arkansas is a "Right to work" state which means you can be fired for and reason of no reason at all "Terminate at will".