It made sense until ' by using no pesticides ' .
How does she not use pesticides to borrow a book... ?
Ambiguous Modifier Apex.
No, the sentence "Sharon borrowed a book about gardening from her mother by using no pesticides" is not incorrect.
Specifically, the actions of borrowing and using do not connect or follow logically in this context. It might work if the sentence conveyed the notion that Sharon mother's lent the book because of her daughter's not relying upon pesticides. But according to the currently conveyed situation, a correct rendering would be as follows: "Sharon borrowed her mother's book on gardening without the use of pesticides."
Neither pesticides nor hormones are used in the production of organic foods.
That is the correct spelling of pesticides (bug killing chemicals).
Yes but, but it would be better as this: You help mom at home with gardening.
You borrow (something) from somebody: the object goes from the other person to you. You lend (something) to somebody: the object goes from you to the other person. In both cases the switch is temporarily; after some time the object has to be returned to the owner.
The correct spelling is "floriculture" (flower gardening).
"How are you" is a correct sentence.
Yes, this sentence is correct.
You are palpitating. This is a correct sentence.
Yes, gardened is correct.
Yes, that is a correct sentence.
That sentence is grammatically correct.
no it is not a correct sentence.