answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Some people want to interpret The Bible literally, but it should only be looked at as a collection of history, allegories, and metaphores, and stories.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is the interpretation of the Bible all literal?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

What is the meaning of the English word Bible?

The literal meaning of the word Bible is "library".


What are the words for ESV Bible?

ESV stands for English Standard Version. This bible is literal word for word translation of Scripture. It was created in response to the need for a bible that had the literal translation style of the King James Version with contemporary language.


How many times are the Twelve Disciples mentioned in the Bible?

The twelve disciples as a literal term is mentioned at least four times in the Bible. They were more commonly refered to as just The Disciples. The literal word Disciple(s) can be found over 160 times in the Bible. Keep in mind however that anyone that believes in, follows and spreads the gospel of Jesus Christ can be considered a disciple. Hope this helps.


Is the King James Bible open to interpretation?

Every single book can be interpreted to mean whatever you want it to mean, to make it say what the author did not intend, and no matter what version is chosen the Bible is no different. Interpretation by who? The basic question is whether the questioner meant interpretation by man OR interpretation by God, (which means letting the Bible interpret the Bible). The "King James" version of the Bible is named after King James simply because he authorized it, not because he altered or interpreted it to mean what he wanted it to say. One version of the Bible is not exactly the same as a different version: if they were the same then there would be no need for yet another one. All translations differ in some way because there are two opposite schools of thought in how scholars should interpret the original-language Greek or Hebrew texts of the Bible into, say, English. These two extremes are formal equivalence (or literal translation - What God actually said ) and functional or dynamic equivalence ( or meaning-based translation - What God actually meant) on the other. The "King James" version of the Bible is a very literal translationand not a meaning-based paraphrase.Explaining this, Henry Neufeld said :..formal equivalence refers to translating by finding reasonably equivalent words and phrases while following the forms of the source language as closely as possible. It is often referred to as "literal translation". functional equivalence, sometimes called dynamic equivalence ormeaning based translation, is a translation method in which the translator attempts to reflect the thought of the writer in the source language [that is, Greek or Hebrew] rather than the words and forms. The translator will read a sentence or other unit of thought, try to understand it as well as possible, and then write that thought in the target language . [for example English](From article "Comparing Versions - Formal and Functional Equivalence" by Henry Neufeld)He furthur said:-...[F]ormal-equivalency ... a word-for-word translation. Since it is impossible to translate every word and form with a single word and form in English, ...[I]t is likely that if we lost the Greek New Testament it could be reproduced by translating the NASB back into Greek.The translators of the King James Bible were as accurate as they possibly could because they all fervently believed that as they were translating the actual words of God, every single word therefore had to be absolutely correct, and so it was translated word-for-word. They would never have eventhought of putting their own personal interpretation on it because they were dealing with God's actual words, and any meaning that was obscure or peculiar would therefore be explained by God's Holy Spirit. It is definitely a literal translation.The Dedicatory Preface of the 1611 edition of the King James Bible dedicating it to King James is 2 pages long and is at, while their attitude towards, reverence, and awe of God and how they viewed Him, and thus their translation, is detailed in their "Translators' Preface" -all 21 pages of it.Just as the translators dared not interpret the Bible, neither did King James, (unlike some previous sovereigns). He was a new king and to avoid civil war he needed a completely impartial Bible translation to unite the various factions in the country and he therefore couldn't have even a whiff of a suspicion of his adding any interpretation of any kind to it whatsoever. (He also valued his head.) Apart from the initial authorization, progress reports, and his acceptance of a Dedication after the translation was completed, King James had nothing to do with the Bible named after him. Although he did not put his personal interpretation on it, that has not stopped others doing so, but it does not make the King James more open to false interpretation than any other.


What is typology and how does it affect the Christian reading of the Old Testament?

Typology is the study and interpretation of types and symbols, originally esp. in the Bible.

Related questions

What is the spiritualization of The Bible?

It is changing a literal interpretation to an allegory.


How did fundamentalism influence the Scope trial?

Fundamentalism Characterized by the belief in a literal, or word for word, interpretation of The Bible.


What did calvinist believe the Bible was?

They believe the Bible is the sole rule of Faith and stress its literal interpretation.


In the 1690's Newton wrote a number of religious tracts dealing with what kind of interpretation of the Bible?

In the 1690s, Newton wrote a number of religious tracts dealing with the literal interpretation of the Bible


What protestant movement was grounded in the literal word for word interpretation of the bible?

Fundamentalism is based on the literal interpretation of the Bible. Some of noted movements in U.S. history include the Great Awakening with three or four waves occurring from the early 18th to the late 20th century.


Do the Amish believe in unicorns?

If you believe in a strict literal interpretation of the bible then yes, there are unicorns mentioned therein.


Why did William Jennings Bryan oppose the theory or evolution?

He tended to believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible and had a deep faith that the Bible was the true word of God.


What idea and values clashed during the scopes trial?

The literal interpretation of The Bible vs. "Darwinism" (i.e.- evolution).


What beliefs based on literal interpretation of the Bible called?

The literal interpretation of the Bible is just that, it's an interpretation. Theologian R.C. Sproul has aptly said "To interpret the Bible literally is to interpret it as literature. Simply put, this means that we are to interpret the Word of God just as we interpret other forms of communication, in its most obvious and natural sense." Problems arise when we start using a strictly wooden literal interpretation, disregarding such things as allegories, parables, apocalyptic hyperbole, fantasy imagery, or spiritualizing Scripture. The literal principle of Biblical interpretation gives you a deeper understanding to the text as you pay closer attention to genre, grammar, syntax, semantics and context.


Why did ideas of Charles Darwin cause controversy?

Darwin's theory of evolution contradicts the literal interpretation of creation as taken from The Bible


What has the big bang got to do with religion?

Essentially nothing. If you insist on a precisely literal interpretation, the theory does contradict the book of Genesis in the Bible.


What has the author Gary Neal Hansen written?

Gary Neal Hansen has written: 'John Calvin and the non-literal interpretation of scripture' -- subject(s): Bible, Commentaries, Contributions in Biblical hermeneutics, Criticism, interpretation, History