If by which you mean the Inverted-U Theory then no they are not. The drive theory suggests the relationship between arousal and performance to be linear, suggesting that as arousal increases as does performance. This has been rejected by most phychologists and adopted the Inverted-U Hypothesis. The Inverted-U hypothesis suggests that though there is a link between arousal and performance it is not linear, more likely an upwards parabola, or an upside-down or 'inverted' U. This suggests that as arousal increases so does performance but only to an optimal point, after which it begins to deteriorate.
The Drive Theory is a term taken from Psychology. The drive theory attempts to analyze, classify, or define what the psychological reasoning behind an action may be. It can be due to past experiences, psychological disorders, and more.
Drive to defend is the answer
I don't think there is such a thing as the "supersonic theory". If you mean "superstring theory", no, they are not the same.
Yes, the Alcubierre Drive relates to a solution to one of Einstein's field equations in his General Theory, although the solution itself does not imply that creation of the drive itself would be a practical endeavor; it remains in the realm of theory.
According to this theory, humans are motivated by either a primary or secondary drive that needs to be satisfied to re-establish homeostasis.
drive reduction theory
Drive-reduction theory...
In theory a rear wheel drive
The "theory" is actually a multitude of theories relating to how our social expectations and responsibilites drive our behaviour. Each theory varies in its details.
#wakeandbake #420 #puffpuffpass
maintaining homeostasis.
No.