Definitely not. When that test was made up, 100 was supposed to mean exactly average for your age.
A lot of people have a lot of doubts and questions about the whole idea of IQ testing, so it's definitely
not something you should spend a lot of time worrying about. But if it did work exactly the way it was
supposed to work, then 103 at any age would mean that about 49% of the people of your same age
have a higher IQ than you, and about 51% of them have a lower IQ.
Maybe the test means something and maybe it doesn't. But there's one thing I can definitely promise you:
A lot of very rich, very important, very successful, and very famous people have IQs that are lower than 103 !
ff
Average IQ is just above 100 so someone getting 108 is just about Mr. Average.
In a perfect IQ test, someone with an IQ of 125 should measure as such at any age. However, because a perfect test has yet to be developed, 125 is technically slightly higher in a child than in an adult.
no
If you tried than yes it is quite bad. In fact it is below average iq but it does;t matter beacuse i have an iq similiar and im a doctor
Lucian Freud HAS NOT died yet. He is 87 years old.
No it is not a bad score. It is perfectly normal and average.
NO BUT ITS NOT BAD EITHER.
A little over 2 years - 365 + 365 = 730 and 833 - 730 = 103. The answer is 2 years 103 days.
103 is slightly above average by 3 points so the answer is yes:-) :-)
As a distinct denomination, from 1906, which means 103 years in 2009.
40-50 years old depending on the enviroment, but their has been a record of up to 103 years old.
It was built in 1907 so 103 years old.
The Plaza Hotels construction was finished in 1907. Which makes it 103 years old.
Sicco Mansholt is 103 years old (birthdate: September 13, 1908).
Dorothy Young is 103 years old (birthdate: May 3, 1907).
There are approximately 100,000 people in the U.S. who are over 100 years old (from Wikipedia)
Nguyen Ngoc Tho is 103 years old (birthdate: May 26, 1908).