Henry David Thoreau uses ethos by presenting himself as a morally principled individual who is willing to stand up for his beliefs in civil disobedience. He emphasizes his personal integrity and conviction in his argument against unjust laws and government actions, demonstrating his credibility and authority on the subject.
Thoreau argues that politicians go with the majority of the people whether it is the just thing to do. He says that even though an issue has a majority, it doesn't mean that the majority is right. Thoreau's view is that a just politician rely on his morals and conscience and do what is right for each individual rather than going with an incorrect majority.
he cites examples of an unpopular war
In Jail
In Jail
The Mexican-American War :)
To compare injustice to something concrete -apex
That it has not done enough to truly represent the people
An individual's relationship to government
Henry David Thoreau
Pointing out that he never refuses to pay highway taxes.
By supporting his argument with an account of personal experience so we will trust him
The role the government should play in people's lives
To explain why citizens have a moral obligation to disobey laws they find unjust
Henry David Thoreau's primary purpose in writing "Civil Disobedience" was to argue for individual resistance to unjust government actions, particularly in the form of passive resistance to unjust laws. Thoreau believed that individuals have a moral obligation to refuse to participate in injustice and to act according to their own conscience.