On a scale of 1 to a barret .50cal at 100 feet. Id say a 7
Not enough information has been provided to give a precise answer.
19.2cm is more precise
A measurement in pints is more precise.
Both can be precise it depends on what you are measuring
what is more precise 2.3 L or 3.1 mL
Yes, the markings on your 50 mL beaker would be accurate enough to use for precise meansurement of volumes. The markings on a 50 mL Erlenmeyer flask would also be accurate enough.
Your question is not precise enough than for an answer of - China and Chinese territories.
Since it was based on the length of a forearm, it wasn't precise enough or standardized.
newtons temperature scale for oneFahrenheit for another. It is not precise enough. Kelvin or degrees Celsius is much more precise. Kelvin is used in most temperature constants as a result.Fahrenheit
Not enough information has been provided to give a precise answer.
A metric gram would be precise enough of a measurement for a stamp.
Please refine your question, it is not precise enough to get a clear understanding of what you are asking.
The first spectroscope precise enough for laboratory use was invented in 1814 by Joseph von Fraunhofer.
the opposite of precise is non-precise?
Please refine your question, it is not precise enough to get a clear understanding of what you are asking.
Please refine your question, it is not precise enough to get a clear understanding of what you are asking.
No. An answer is only as precise as the least precise measurement from which it was calculated.