The original meaning of the word chuck as it is applied in the case of the woodchuck is 'a dweller' in other words the 'dweller of the woods' or 'that thing that lives in the woods.' Used as a verb the word chuck means 'to throw'. So my opinion is no, woodchucks do not chuck wood.
a woodchuck would chuck as many wood a woodchuck could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood
AS MUCH AS A WOOD CHUCK COULD CHUCK WOOD IF A WOOD CHUCK COULD CHUCK WOOD :0 :) ;)
10
chuck chuck asgh wood wood triantiose
Yes. After capturing so many of them to uncover the truth of how much wood it could actually chuck, scientists nearly depleted the wood chuck population. Yes. After capturing so many of them to uncover the truth of how much wood it could actually chuck, scientists nearly depleted the wood chuck population.
The Trojan Horse.A Greek poet, Homer, wrote this in his book the Odessy. (not Homer Simpson.)
based on the function of the shed determines the name of the shed. woodshed could store wood garden shed would store garden tools a tool shed would store tools etc...
If it was two inches long it could not have been a bee. Without further information I would suspect it was a queen hornet.
This depends on where you live. It could be a wood mouse, field mouse, house mouse, mole, vole, packrat or something else. You would have to see it to identify it.
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, and chuck as much woodAs a woodchuck would if a woodchuck could chuck wood. Is the full version.
The original tongue-twister is of unknown origin. In it,"How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?is paired with"A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could if a woodchuck could chuck wood."or"As much wood as a woodchuck would, if a woodchuck could chuck wood."
None!
As much wood as a woodchuck chucks if a woodchuck could chuck wood..... Riddle answer (It's not supposed to be scientific or just a number.) : As much wood as a wood chuck could chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood. See? Not scientifically just a tongue twister. BTW the question's supposed to be : How much wood can a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood? Similar : How much wood would a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood? Only difference is the would and can. See it?
The original tongue-twister is of unknown origin. In it,"How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?is paired with"A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could if a woodchuck could chuck wood."or"As much wood as a woodchuck would, if a woodchuck could chuck wood."
Woodchuck Tongue Twister:How much wood would a woodchuck chuckif a woodchuck could chuck wood?Answer given in reply;He would chuck, he would, as much as he could,and chuck as much wood as a woodchuck wouldif a woodchuck could chuck wood.
It was originally a question and answer: Q: How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? A: As much wood as a woodchuck could chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood!
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood There is an aswer to it as well: A woodchuck would chuck all the wood if a woodchuck could chuck wood
as much as he wants
The origin of the tongue twister is unknown: "How much wood a wood chuck could chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood."
a woodchuck could chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
First off, it is not a "chuck of wood." Second, a woodchuck can't chuck wood; it's scientifictly impossible to get the right answer. The original tongue twister goes: "How much wood would a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood?"