It makes absolutely no difference. The Supreme Court (either State or Federal) does not conduct jury trials. They simply review the cases submitted to them on appeal from the lower courts.
There is no requirement for witnesses.
To be convicted of treason, prosecutors need at least two eye witnesses. With out any witnesses, a person can not be convicted of treason.
You need two witnesses for a will or codicil to a will. However, if the will or codicil is entirely handwritten (holographic will/codicil), no witnesses are needed. Holographic wills are valid in Ontario, Alberta, New Brunswick, Newfoundland, Quebec, Manitoba and Saskatchewan.
12 minimum
schools needed to desegregate
2
More details are needed to provide an answer to this question.
Many would say they are. Quite a few witnesses say "They are glad they are" because before they became JWs their brain was full of dirty thoughts etc. and their brains needed washing! In reality, it takes a huge amount of study to become a witness and they enter and get baptized of their own free will. Many highly intelligent people are witnesses. So the objective answer is no they are not.
The Supreme Court ruled that Nixon had to expose his secret tapes.
unleaded supreme
Why in the world would anyone need to know that? There is no valid reason for a witnesses' finances to be needed.
No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two credible witnesses.