0
Intelligent Design is a line of subjective argumentation within creationism, which generally implies the following flow of deduction:
1. The universe is complex from a macro to a micro scale, therefore there is an intelligent designer/creator.
The Scientific Response:
The fact that the universe is complex in no way infers that a creator or designer is responsible for it.
2. The universe had a beginning, and a beginning must have a cause outside of itself.
The Scientific Response:
In Indo-German languages (which includes English) a verb must have a subject, and thus an effect must have an independent cause. It is therefore tempting to assume that this grammatical rule is also a law of nature - but it is not.
Quantum theory has proven that objective observation is impossible (i.e. that observing an effect actually influences it - the Heisenberg Principle), and that all matter and energy in the universe is interconnected, with quantum "wavicles" spontaneously arising and dissapearing. This concept is very counter-intuitive to human beings because within our limited scope of perception things appear to be very different. Modern quantum physics has solid theories backed up by decades of research that can explain a universe giving rise to itself. Creationism only offers a subjective deduction without any solid research or evidence that would withstand scientific scrutiny.
3. The creator of the universe is an intelligent designer who exactly and only fits the description of the God of the Bible
The Scientific Response:
Creationism offers no objective rationale for this statement, its largest leap of deduction: it is one thing to argue that the universe was created (i.e. Deism) than to state that this creator would exactly and only correspond to that of one belief system among many (i.e. Theism), on a single planet, orbiting a common yellow dwarf, in the extremis of a single spiral of a galaxy among billions of galaxies in the universe.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoIntelligent Design does not openly mention God. Rather, it shows the vast complexity of living things, which ostensibly should mean that living things had a deliberate designer. Creationism, on the other hand, names God as the Creator, and provides various arguments to that effect.
See also:
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the differences and similarities between creationism intelligent design and evolution?
The first two say "gee - it's so complicated somebody must have planed it" along with the extra ego trip that says that we're pretty special. Evolution says that one single rule can generate complexity from simplicity. (The rule is let the weak weed themselves out - we call it death.) Forget the God argument ... He could have invented evolution too. In fact, it would take a superior sort of entity to do do so.
5 What are some of the design features of the termite mounds that make them very special and intelligent?
What are some of the design features of the termite mounds that make them very special and intelligent? What are some of the design features of the termite mounds that make them very special and intelligent?
How does evolution involve creationism?
Evolution does NOT involve creationism.Evolution is a testable and therefore provable explanation as to how the diversity of life on earth has happened.Creationism is a religious viewpoint and therefore a mater of faith.AnswerI agree with the above. Evolution does NOT involve Creationism. Evolution is a branch of biological science and thus rejects "supernatural" claims such as those of Creationism, does not need to consider them. Creationism, often hanging on Genesis, the first book of the Bible, predates scientific inquiry and the scientific method and so is thus rejected by science and thus evolutionary science. In the public spotlight, the so-called Evolution-Creation "controversy" and all the on-stage arguments and debates might make it seem as though Evolution and Creationism (and Intelligent Design) have a lot to do with one another, but I doubt Creationism gets much mention at all in scientific laboratories and scientific conferences (it can't because it hasn't got anything to say about the real world.)
How should scientists respond to the Intelligent Design movement?
Intelligent design is not creationism or other religious hogwash. It has much scientific evidence. Scientists need to see Intelligent Design as another theory, another viable explanation for how the earth came into being and influenced how it is today. They should support their fellow scientists working on Intelligent Design.AnswerScientists are well-studied, well-knowledged researchers. They study biology and chemistry and geology and physics. Science has advanced people through medical and technological and agricultural revolutions.On the other hand, Intelligent Design is not a theory (that can be used to advance humanity like science's theories), but a political movement (which some emphasis on trying to get itself taught in classes in public schools).Not being a theory, and a political movement actually gets in the way of science (particularly when it tries to displace parts of science on school curricula).Intelligent Design is in fact creationism 'in disguise'. Some extreme fundamentalists have even been reported as convincing cancer patients to rather use 'faith healing' rather than their anticancer medicines. This is very dangerous of course.In the case of the world of faiths, whether 'real' creationism, Intelligent Design or other, there is always a foggy area as to where things can go, it just depends on opinion and faith.In the case of science, the theories are as hard and fast as they can be and as correct as they can be at present. And look at how much progress we have made just by science.Intelligent Design at its best is simply a philosophical device that serves the same purpose as creationism. But it doesn't advance the world scientifically at all, since it lives in the realm of faith.Science has most of the answers that Intelligent Design and creationism try to answer, and has good guesses as to what the remaining answers to the mysteries of the Universe might be. Since ID and creationism have failed to provide anything scientific or useful so far, most scientists would have nothing to say about it.There is a problem about ID trying to undermine science education by insinuating itself onto school curricula (it does this politically). And some of its relatives (the fundamentalism mentioned earlier) present problems when they encourage faith as an absolute all-time replacement for important medications.Scientists, and the public, should of course confront these problems.As I had stated earlier Intelligent Design is notcreationism. I believe you are confusing hard core facts with religion. Many scientists working with Intelligent Design have furthered research for mankind, and have made discoveries beneficial to health, astronomy, biology, and other spheres.These extreme fundamentalists that try to convince people to reject modern medicine in favor of supernatural healing sound like preachers, or charismatic Christians I highly doubt any scientist would do something so absurd. If you respond to my argument, I would highly appreciate it if you would send me the article in which this was recorded.Scientific theories are always up for examination. As technology develops so does our knowledge of the world around us. Columbus is an excellent example. Before he returned from his journey to the New World, it was a scientific fact that the world was flat. It was accepted in all scientific circles and was common knowledge for everyday people. Later, when Columbus returned, that fact was placed under scrutiny and finally discarded in favor of a new theory.You stated that science has answers to some questions that Intelligent Design cannot answer, but you fail to recognize that it is the same for evolution. The question of how the earth and life was created is the greatest mystery of all time, and people will argue over it until the end of time. I personally cannot accept the theory of evolution because it seems to be a political issue, like your views of Intelligent Design, and the evidence in its favor seem weak. I would suggest looking at the Cambrian Explosion, which, I believe, is the biggest hole in the evolution theory.America was founded freedom. The first Article of the Constitution states the right of freedom of thought and freedom of speech. I believe that both the theories of Intelligent Design and evolution should be offered to the masses for them to decide. The arguments above prove the fact that there are two very different views with two very different supporters, but that is not a bad thing. In school, you are taught to analyze facts presented to you and form your own opinions, but how are you supposed to do that if only one side of the argument is presented?
What is a clever title for evolution v. creationism persuasive essay. I am for evolution?
Richard Dawkins battles the creationism and evolution landscape with many a lengthy book on the subjects or, presumably, clever article. The titles of his books are quite good, such as Climbing Mount Improbable or The Selfish Gene or River out of Eden or The Ancestor's Tale. I have no idea of any titles for you (obviously you can't use Dawkins' titles). I did once consider the title The Intelligent Design of Education, for an article on whether Intelligent Design was worthy to be taught alongside or instead of evolution in classes. The title was supposed to imply the 'intelligent design' of education and educational decrees in cases where they excluded such things as Intelligent Design and creationism. Of course, 'clever' titles on this topic are likely to amuse biologists and infuriate fundamentalists. On April the 1st of one year (probably a complete April Fool), it appeared that Scientific American (I think it was that) wrote an editorial saying things like we scientists should discard observation and experiment and embrace faith and creationism. One wonders how that went down. Still, as I say, a complete April Fool.For your title, you can use plays on words, which are always clever. I sometimes rather like alliteration. Test your language. Look at the context and final product of your essay. Flip words this way and that. As I say, try puns and plays on words.In a case where you defy or deny evolution, The Creation of Evolution could be the start of a title, followed by perhaps a derogatory ending that implies it incorrect or idiotic.In the case in which you find holes in and dismiss creationism, try The Evolution of Creation, perhaps implying that creation is a made-up story that is imagined by creatures that are simply the product of evolution.Oh well, good luck with your persuasive essay. Gather your facts well and good luck with the title.
What is one-word synonym for intelligent design?
Many people believe that creationism is a one word synonym for intelligent design. Though this is not true, I hope it may be the answer you are looking for.
Is intelligent design the same as creationism?
For the most part, yes, but there are some key differences. Intelligent Design (ID) does not mention who is the creator or deity. Creationism is based strictly on the Bible teachings in the book of Genesis. Either way, they both believe that humans are too complex to have been designed by evolution or natural selection.
How did 19th century Americans view the concept of intelligent design?
ID is a recent reformatting of the concepts of creationism.
What is the difference between a creationist and an Intelligent Design proponent?
Intelligent Design proponents are creationists, but not all creationists are Intelligent Design proponents. Proponents of Intelligent Design insist that it is not Creationism because it is not a specifically religious hypothesis. They hoped to convince the United States Supreme Court that their hypothesis is not based on religious beliefs and should be treated in law in the same way as is science. However, evidence presented to the Supreme Court showed that Intelligent Design is Creationism under another name, and that its proponents had always intended it to be so.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Which Public schools teach intelligent design?
Public schools in the United States are forbidden by law from teaching intelligent design/creationism as a fact or as a scientific theory because it violates the establishment clause which allows no public establishment to "respect or endorse religion".
What are the differences between evolution creationism and intelligent design?
All three teachings purport to have some bearing on the origination of man - but that's about the extent of the similarities. Evolutionary theory is the scientific model that explains how all modern species diverged from common ancestors. Creationism is the school of thought that teaches that (some interpretation of) holy scripture is literally true, and that mankind was created by God or gods, specially and separate from all other lifeforms. Intelligent design in its most general form does not reject evolutionary theory, but states that a guiding intelligence must have been involved in the divergence of lifeforms as they approached modernity. It may be seen as an attempt by religiously-minded people to reconcile their theistic beliefs with scientific findings, but it may also be seen as an attempt by creationists to insert their religious beliefs into science. It has been said that intelligent design is actually a form of creationism in disguise, and a response to the outlawing of the teaching of creationism in public schools. Some proponents of intelligent design (seemingly) accept the notion of common descent, while others outright reject it, reducing their intepretation of intelligent design to a more fundamental form of creationism. The basic teachings of intelligent design vary, depending on the person you ask, or the time and context in which you ask.
The intelligent design movement seeks scientific backings for creationism?
The Intelligent Design movement has been seeking scientific backing for creationism since the late twentieth century. Unfortunately for the movement, no such support has been forthcoming, nor is it likely to come, since so-called Intelligent Design is unsupported by facts or evidence.
Are there any valid arguments that support intelligent design?
An increasingly large percentage of modern scientists believe in an intelligent designer of the universe and life, and this is now an established one way trend. To understand why this interesting and relatively recent turn of events has occurred, see Intelligent Design vs. Evolution - The Miracle of Intelligent Design at the attached link.A Different PerspectiveThere is no widespread acceptance of intelligent design aka creationism within the mainstream scientific community. For an interesting and comprehensive discussion of the pseudoscience used to support ID and the scientific counter-arguments see the decision in Kitzmiller v Dover at the link provided below.
Explain why intelligent design is not a testable theory?
Creationism, intelligent design, and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science. To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning. A scientific method consists of the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses. Intelligent design relies on supernatural explanations that are often not testable nor reproducible. When testable 'experiments' are conducted their conclusions neither lend support or disprove anything with respect to intelligent design. They merely allow for a convenient segway to talk about creationism and other arguments which rely on faith.
What are some good websites for creationism?
Creationism is the belief that the earth and living things derive from explicit acts of Divine Creation. For young-Earth creationists, this comprises a literal understanding of the Book of Genesis and the disbelief in Evolution. Here are some websites for creationism including young-earth, old-earth, and intelligent design creationism. Answers in Genesis: Young-earth creationist department, which operates a Creation Museum. Access Research Network: Advocates of Intellectual Design Creationism. Center for Science and Culture: Intelligent design belief. Part of the Seattle-based Discovery Institute. Creation Ministries International: Young-earth creationists. Creation Research Society: Research arm of the creation Institute. Institute for Creation Research: A central group of young-earth creationism.
What was Charles Darwin interested in?
Charles Darwin was anaturalist, he also had a keen interest in questioning whether or not creation was the true earthly origin. funny though, many scientists now call creationism intelligent design, but are considering the possibility of Alien creators, but then, that would be another form of intelligent design, wouldn't it?
In what year was intelligent design thought of?
Barbara Forrest describes the intelligent design movement as beginning in 1984 when Jon A. Buell's religious organisation the Foundation for Thought and Ethics published The Mystery of Life's Origin by creationist and chemist Charles Thaxton. The idea for intelligent design came about because the United States courts rejected the teaching of creationism, and then 'creation science', as science in the school syllabus. The proponents of intelligent design hoped that the courts would accept intelligent design as a suitable topic for a science course, taught alongside, or instead of, evolution.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
