The laws of thermodynamics tell us to expect observable changes when we perturb (change) the inputs or conditions of the environment in this case, the earth. What we put into the air, how we change the surface through logging and agriculture, and what we dump into the ocean can all wind up altering the climate if they provide a big enough change. The laws of thermodynamics tell us that factors that as changes occur in factors that influence climate, the equilibrium state will shift. What it will shift TO is still up for debate. This despite all the claims by the nay-sayers that humans have no effect on the environment and by doom-sayers that we already can predict climate change accurately enough to know what changes we must or must not make in order to assure the climate we think is optimal.
As an example: increased anthropogenic (i.e. caused by humans) CO2 can cause an increase in the greenhouse effect - or it could stimulate more plant growth - or it could cause increasing acidity of the rain - or change the pH of the ocean - OR - some combination of the above to greater or lesser degrees as well as other effects . This might mean increased melting of polar ice caps, changes in wind patterns, suppression or stimulation of growth of different organisms, increasing rainfall in some areas with decreased rain in others and, of course, changes in the average temperature in different areas.
Often the effects are difficult to predict only apparent after the fact and even then it remains open to debate. As an example - we know that the arctic ice pack seems to have shrunk significantly over the past 20 years. A large chunk of part of the Antarctic ice has has also apparently thinned - BUT - most of the Antarctic ice has thickened considerably; it seems to have thickened enough to offset the loss of ice elsewhere so that global sea levels have remained relatively constant. It represents a new equilibrium but not one that most global climate models can account for. Since the models don't reproduce that effect, they may not be reliable at predicting a tipping point where that Antarctic ice might melt like the Arctic ice and actually produce the rising sea levels we are often warned about.
Bear in mind that in science, all laws are part of theories. Thermodynamics has 3 laws, and is also a theory.
The understanding of the laws of thermodynamics (natural phenomena) made it possible for engineers to design and build air conditioners (technological products).
There are three laws of thermodynamics, not inlcluding the understood fourth law. Thermodynamics is the study of how energy is transferred in a system.
Competition and government regulations affect the moral climate of businesses. When a business can't compete the right way managers feel the need to circumvent laws and act immorally.
Two scientists who are generally thought of as establishing the laws of thermodynamics are French physicist Nicolas Léonard Sadi Carnot who studied the efficiency of heat engines believing it was the key that could help France win the Napoleonic Wars and Scottish physicist Lord Kelvin who was was the first to formulate a concise definition of thermodynamics in 1854.
Yes. Nothing remains the same for long (it is one of the consequences of the laws of thermodynamics).
Thermodynamics is part of physics.
Scientific rules and laws concerning thermodynamics.
Bear in mind that in science, all laws are part of theories. Thermodynamics has 3 laws, and is also a theory.
Thermodynamics
True
none
No. The laws of thermodynamics were fully operationallong before anybody knew anything about math.
The understanding of the laws of thermodynamics (natural phenomena) made it possible for engineers to design and build air conditioners (technological products).
William Herrick Macaulay has written: 'The laws of thermodynamics' -- subject(s): Thermodynamics
No one has yet documented a case where a chemical reaction does not obey the laws of thermodynamics - so - yes - all the chemical reactions will obey the laws of thermodynamics. On a philosophic note: since no exceptions to the theories that constitute thermodynamics have been observed, we consider them "laws". Should we ever find an exception, we will have to modify the theories to craft new rules that will then be considered "laws". That's how science works.
to help improve the steam engine