the court's interpretation of whether the equal protection clause allowed racial segregation
In the case of Plessy v Ferguson, the supreme court ruled that segregation under the "seperate but equal" clause was constitutional, but in the case of Brown v the Board of Education, the supreme court ruled that under the 14th amendment, segregation was unconstitutional.
while the piessy decision established the doctrine of "separate but equal," the brown decision sated the separate was always unequal
While the Plessy decisions established the doctrine of "separate but equal" the Brown decision stated that separate was always unequal
the court's interpretation of whether the equal protection clause allowed racial segregation
interpretations of whether the equal protection clause allows segregation
interpretations of whether the equal protection clause allows segregation
Plessy v. Ferguson.
Plessy v. Ferguson
Type your answer here... Plessy v. Ferguson.
Plessy V Ferguson (1896)
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896),
Plessy v. Ferguson.
The Supreme Court case of Plessy Versus Ferguson was extremely important. It declared that the doctrine of 'separate but equal' was constitutional. This upheld government sanctioned racism in America.
The Supreme Court case of Plessy Versus Ferguson was extremely important. It declared that the doctrine of 'separate but equal' was constitutional. This upheld government sanctioned racism in America.
The "separate but equal" doctrine was ruled uncostitional