0
How did the byzabtine empire build on the ways of the roman empire?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
The Byzantine Empire was the Roman Empire.
Byzantine Empire is a term coined by historians to indicate the eastern part of the Roman Empire after the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire. The Romans themselves did not use this term. They just had the term Roman Empire. The eastern part of the Roman Empire continued to exist for another 1,000 year after the fall of the western part.
The term Byzantine is derived from Byzantium, the name of the Greek city which was redeveloped, turned into the capital of the eastern part of the Roman Empire and renamed Constantinople by Constantine the Great in 330. It is used to indicate the fact that not long after the fall of the west, this empire became centred on Greece and Greek in character after it lost most of its non-Greek territories. Greek replaced Latin as the official language of this empire in 620, some 150 years after the fall of the west.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoThe Byzantine Empire was the continuation of the Roman Empire. It is a term which has been coined by modern historians to indicate the eastern part of the Roman Empire after the fall of the western part of this empire. The western part fell under the strain of the invasions by the Germanic peoples. The eastern part was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist for nearly 1000 years. The people in question did not know the term Byzantine Empire and called their empire Roman Empire
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are two ways the Roman Empire brought civilization to many parts of Europe?
Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.
In what ways do you think Roman engineering skills helped to strengthen the Roman empire?
Please specify which development you are referring to.
Is the proper spelling Romans' or Roman's when you talking about them owning something?
The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.
What did Roman slaves do to buy freedom?
Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.
What are 5 specific ways the Roman Empire declined?
The migration of Germanic people into Europe led to the decline of the Roman Empire. The empire also became too large to govern.
In what ways was the Byzantine empire different from the western roman empire?
it was different the wright wayy''' xD
What are two ways the Roman Empire brought civilization to many parts of Europe?
Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.
What was seen as a direct descendant of the roman empire?
Its leaders saw themselves as roman emperors, and theirand their government was in many ways a direct continuation of the eastern portion of the late roman empire
In what ways do you think Roman engineering skills helped to strengthen the Roman empire?
Please specify which development you are referring to.
In what ways was Christianity a unifying force in the Roman Empire?
in what way was Christianity a unifying force in the roman
In what ways was the byzantine different from the western roman empire?
it was different the wright wayy''' xD
Was the empire of Charlemagne a successor of the Roman Empire?
Yes, the empire of Charlemagne, also known as the Carolingian Empire, was considered a successor to the Western Roman Empire. Charlemagne was crowned as the Holy Roman Emperor by Pope Leo III in 800, which symbolized a continuity of imperial power in Western Europe after the collapse of the Roman Empire. However, it is important to note that while Charlemagne's empire drew inspiration from the Roman Empire, it was a distinct political entity with its own institutions and culture.
In what ways did Ghana build an empire?
they controlled many trade routes, which made them have great wealth
How did Byzantines follow Roman ways in the beginning?
The Byzantines did not follow the Roman ways. They were the Romans. Byzantine and Byzantine Empire are terms which have been coined by historians. The former first appeared in 1648 and the latter became popular in the 19th century. It is a term which is used to indicate the eastern part of the Roman Empire which continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years after the fall of the western part of this empire. The people in question did not even know this term and called their empire Roman Empire or empire of the Romans. Although this empire was centred on Greece, these peoples regarded themselves as Romans. This was because in 212 the emperor Caracalla extended Romans citizenship to all the freeborn males in the Roman Empire, regardless of ethnicity. Therefore, the people in question were Roman citizens.
What was Pompeii's lifestyles?
The same as the rest of the Roman empire really, basically the same as Rome in it's traditions and ways.
Is the proper spelling Romans' or Roman's when you talking about them owning something?
The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.
What three ways in which Jesus's ideas spread throughout the Roman Empire?
By the written word, by word of mouth and the first Christian Roman Emporer Constantine forcing it on his subjects.
