Civil cases are punished by means of fines or restrictions or controls on ones activities or business - no jail or prison time is called for in the statute.
Criminal cases - the defendant can be sentenced to jail or prison.
The threshold for conviction in a criminal case is beyond a shadow of a doubt. Jurors must feel 100% certain that a conviction has been proven without any doubt in their mind.
In civil court, its purponderence of the evidence. If youre 51% sure of something, thats good enough. You can have doubts or reservations, but youre going strictly on what you believe is more likely than not.
The way a trial moves a long is much different, too. Criminal cases tend to be scattered over many short appearence in court, while civil cases are usually given a scheduled time of anywhere from a day to 5 weeks, where they are the only people before the judge.
The penalty for violating criminal law can be a monetary fine, jail, or prison.
The penalty for violating civil law can amount to no more than a monetary fine. There is no incarceration involved in violating civil law.
- - - - -
The official difference is that criminal law is concerned with the welfare of the community as a whole, where as civil law is aimed for the individual.
Civil cases provide a remedy - such as a monetary award to restore the 'victim'.
Criminal cases involve the police and give sanctions (such as jail), which dont associate in civil law.
- i read this out of my textbook...
Criminal cases - are usually presided over by a judge and jury. Civil cases are usually heard by a small panel of judges.
If the criminal conviction is unrelated to the civil claim, it is irrelevant. The difficulty with being held in custody is that because it may not be easy to attend court, the case may be heard in your absence.
Civil
It is a criminal case.
The differences is that one cases is criminal and the other is a civil case.
Civil
The question makes no sense. A "charge" refers to a criminal charge. A civil case refers to a case that is not criminal.
theft is generally regarded as a criminal case but if the victim who was stolen from wishes to take action to recover the losses, then it will be a civil case as well
Unlike the arson case, which was a criminal case, Aaron's divorce action was a civil case.
In both cases, the moving party bears the burden of proof. In a criminal case, that is the government. In a civil case, that is the plaintiff.
If there are, in fact, both a criminal and a civil side to the incident, the criminal aspect will be handled first. The "state's" (i.e.: the "people's") interests in prosecuting a crime take precedence over the civil wrong against an individual. (Think the O.J. Simpson case.) Traditionally, the criminal matter will be decided first. This is primarily because proceeding with the civil case can prejudice a criminal defendant's rights. The civil case will wind up stalled because the criminal defendant can refuse to comply with civil discovery by asserting the right to remain silent. Admissions or statements given in a civil case could be employed against the criminal defendant. As a practical matter the civil case cannot proceed until there is a resolution of the criminal matter. For further information see the related links below.
There are different categories of death. Therefore cases that involve a death may be heard in criminal or civil court depending on the circumstances. A case where a person died as a result of a car accident in which no one violated the law would be heard in civil court. A case in which someone purposely hit and killed someone with their car would be heard in criminal court.
Unless you are a registered pharmacist.