It is understood, while perhaps not what one would call arranged marriages- there were mass-produced , if you will mass weddings in the Fascist Period which were evidentally conducted in stadia and had the usual loudspeaker stuff here taken over by clergy. The entire canonical ( church laws, nothing to do with Gun control) norms were kept- but there was something of an assembly-line atmosphere one would not normally consider a ( Love Feast). More recently in the United States, and elsewhere, the Unification Church of Rev. Moon conducted Mass Marriages, again in stadiums and locations such as Madison Square Garden- put mildly, a logistical nightmare. I do not know if these still occur. The Catholic Church has nothing internal that would block mass-production weddings- but the concept has gone out of Vogue ( style, niot the fashion magazine which, get this was banned in Russia, Sunway cionductors were offered bonuses by the Agency for confiscating copies of this Western publication!
Darude Sandstorm
Strengthen business or family ties
Marriages should be arranged if the two people involved want them to be.
Arranged marriages were very common throughout the world until the 18th century. In China, arranged marriages sometimes called blind marriages were the norm before the mid 20th century
prearranged marriages are arranged years before the date. prearranged marriages are arranged years before the date. prearranged marriages are arranged years before the date.
Arranged marriages don't always work.
no
you ;)
Most are very much against arranged marriages, at least in the Western world.
The Hebrews were very into arranged marriage but I don't know of any MODERN religions that are into arranged marriages. They silly if you ask me...
Arranged marriages leave no scope for interfaith marriages so that means a particular religion propagates through progeny and the numbers are maintained
In India the percentage of arranged marriages is higher then love marriages. Could be sixty percent.