Of course it is. If done well. All eras of poetry produced small amounts of magnificent poetry and boatloads of bad poetry. Good poetry is always good no matter what form or time period it is written in.
Modernist poetry and traditional poetry both have their own unique strengths and styles. While traditional poetry often focuses on structured forms and meter, modernist poetry tends to experiment with language, form, and ideas in a more avant-garde way. It ultimately depends on personal preference and the reader's interpretation of what makes poetry effective.
Not all modernist poems rhymes, the poets chose from already existing stlye which style to follow. Some poets model their poems after the neoclassical poetry of heroic couplet while some follows the trend of the romantics' free verse. The choice of what style to use in writing depends on what the poet reads. Not all modernist poems rhymes
The modernists did not follow uniform rhyme and rhythm patterns
It really depends on the product. There are green cleaning products that are equally or more effective than traditional cleaning supplies.
They are really only affective (and really only accepted) in poetry and stylistic writing. An example of the latter is Mark Danielewiski's House of Leaves, a book I highly recommend. XD
Lines grouped into stanzas by john overbay
Someone who is really good at poetry can be called a poet or a wordsmith.
You can get to know people for who they really are.
No one really knows just some random guy.
Modernism covers a large number of writers, and a large geographical area (most of the innovative writers from both Europe and the US who established themselves later than about 1890 will come under the heading 'Modernist' for at least some of their output); there isn't really any single 'fundamental' value of modernism, it is more a general way of approaching writing. That said: 1) almost all 'modernist' writers prefer to use natural language over literary forms (traditionalist writers as late as 1900 were still using 'thee', 'goeth', 'where'er', 'alas' in poetry - modernists try to write the way people actually talk: 'you', 'goes', 'wherever') 2) similarly, a modernist usually writes about the world he knows, not some old-fashioned fantasy world (traditionalist Alfred Dumas wrote about musketeers who rode around on steeds and fought with swords; modernist Emile Zola wrote about women who were married to rich factory-owners, and committed adultery) 3) as modernism takes hold (mainly after World War I) you increasingly see modernist authors having strong political or social ideas. Traditional authors like Dumas or Balzac were mainly interested in producing books which would sell well, and that the audience would enjoy reading. Modernist writers were more likely to want to write books that 'made people think'. Many early modernist writers were sympathetic to Fascism (Yeats, Pound, Marinetti), later there were more Socialist modernists (Brecht, Dos Passos). There was no special political orientation that made you a modernist, but modernists were much more likely to have political messages in their work than more traditional writers.
It's a really good piece of poetry and maybe even from a king or queen.
No, verses do not have to rhyme. While many traditional forms of poetry use rhyme, free verse and other modern styles of poetry often do not follow a rhyming pattern. The choice to rhyme or not depends on the poet's preferences and the style of poetry being written.
A poetry
Not really...Only if they're really hot... =D
It really depends on what you believe. Some people have had great success with homepathic medications where as others don't find that they work at all. Personally, I haven't had any luck with them.