Depends on which machine gets your heart rate up the most, and how long you can keep going.
Calorie burn is pretty much all about getting your heart rate up and keeping it up for an extended time. Most people would burn more calories on something cycle-like than a rower, as the rower is more likely to tire them out too soon to achieve an worthwhile calorie burn.
Rower - a more full body work out - upper and lower body both.
Running - Mainly lower body.
Eat less calories, and burn more calories than you've eaten exercising. The only way to lose weight is if you burn more calories than you consume.
Yes, it is possible to lose weight without being on a diet. To lose weight, you must use more calories then you consume, generally 500 calories to lose 2 pounds a week. Staying active will burn more calories.
3,500 calories.
yes to lose weight you need to burn more calories than you eat for example if you ate 700 caloreis you need to burn about 900 calories that will help you lose weight. trust me it happen for me and it will happen for you
Less calories in, more exercise out.
No. You lose more blood.
Well yes, you lose weight by burning more calories then you consume, and vitamins will help replace the nutrients you are missing since you are cutting calories.
To lose one solid pound of weight, you need to burn 3,500 more calories to consume. Then, to lose 52 solid pounds of weight, you would need to burn 182,000 calories.
To lose one solid pound of weight, you need to burn 3,500 more calories than you consume. To lose 45 pounds, then, you would need to burn (3,500 x 45) 157,500 more calories than you consume.
Basically, yes. IF you get your heart rat up you will use more calories.
To lose one solid pound of weight, you need to burn 3,500 more calories than you consume. So burning 2,000 calories means you burnt about 2/3 of a pound.
Your body needs calories to survive. To lose weight, cut your daily intake of calories by 500 and exercise for an hour 5-6 days a week. Ingesting more calories will not help you lose weight.