Daniel Shay's Rebellion proved that the Articles of Confederation was not enough for peacetime. George Washington was very concerned as were many other American leaders. The Articles of Confederation only allowed for troops for times of war, not for domestic disturbances. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay wrote about the needs of the federal government in the Federal Papers that were published in newspapers of the time.
Actually, Shays Rebellion showed that the government was weak under the Article of Confederation. Shays Rebellion made people reevaluate the Article of Confederation since there was no built up army in order to control the attack. Hence, the elite had to built up an army in order to control the attack.
Shays Rebellion proved that the federal government was stronger and more powerful than the Articles of Confederation. Before Shays Rebellion, there was Bacon's Rebellion in 1676 which the government did not stop. Bacon ran the governor (Berkley) out and took control until Bacon died. Bacon's Rebellion proved that the nation was too weak under the Articles.
He believed with a stronger central government would protect against popular unrest.
yes
The central government did not provide troops to quell the rebellion.
SUCKER...... i want to know too
shays rebellion proved the need for a stronger government, so no it didn't
Shays's Rebellion would change the opinion in favor of those who wanted the Constitution to structure a stronger central government.
Shay's Rebellion was trying to prove to the government that they were taxing the lands too high. So they burned down buildings and killed people where involved with the high taxing. Does that help?
The central government did not provide troops to quell the rebellion.
It is false that Shays' Rebellion was carried out to support a weak central government. The rebellion was carried out by farmers who were upset with the courts taking their farms.
It is false that Shays' Rebellion was carried out to support a weak central government. The rebellion was carried out by farmers who were upset with the courts taking their farms.
SUCKER...... i want to know too
the united states did not have enough arsenals
SUCKER...... i want to know too
Daniel shays
The price of a weak central government is anarchy.
shays rebellion proved the need for a stronger government, so no it didn't
Shays's Rebellion would change the opinion in favor of those who wanted the Constitution to structure a stronger central government.
Shays's Rebellion would change the opinion in favor of those who wanted the Constitution to structure a stronger central government.
Shays's Rebellion would change the opinion in favor of those who wanted the Constitution to structure a stronger central government.