People have been convicted without proper evidence. The accusation should be investigated; perhaps you did have a gun and fear a conviction based solely on her testimony. I don't know how to prove a negative (that you did not have a gun), but if you did there are other ways to show it besides her say so; other people saw it, there is other evidence of a gun in your possession like bullets or a gun box. This is why you need a lawyer.
they were convicted of murder without hard evidence
They were convicted of murder without hard evidence.
They were convicted of murder without hard evidence.
Ask the judge
If the plaintiff cannot prove that the defendant commited theft, then the defendent is free to go. However, sometimes evidence is misinterpretted. Innocent people have been convicted at times.
== == I believe his name was Ron Rickman. Not sure on the spelling. I believe he did away with his wife, said she was on a shopping trip and never returned.
If caught driving without proof of insurance and convicted is this considered a misdemeanor?
The duration of Without Evidence is 1.55 hours.
Several possibilities: (#1-and best of all) a confession by the perpetrator. Failing that; (#2) The defendant had a good motive and good circumstantial evidence can be proven. It is a bit unusual, BUT NOT A RARITY, for a defendant to be convicted in the absence of the victim's actual remains.
Without Evidence was created on 2000-09-12.
Conviction in the legal sense would mean that the person has alread been found guilty. But a suspect can be held for about 48 hours without being charged with a crime. If there is not enough evidence or for whatever reason charges are not filed then the suspect must be released. In addition, a suspect may be held in jail without being convicted if he cannot make bail or if the ability to be released on bail is denied.
NO