Generally, no, unless the landlord has some type of court order or written agreement that bars the former tenant from entering the property. The current tenant has the right to have visitors unless special conditions were mentioned in the written lease agreement.
they may claim it
Yes. There are numerous reasons your landlord can ban your family from rental property depending on the circumstances and the reason for the ban.Examples:Your original rental agreement may be for occupancy by a certain number of people and the landlord can refuse to allow any others to move in with you.Your landlord can ban your family members from the property if complaints have been made regarding their conduct by other residents at the premises.Your landlord can ban your family members from the property if they have caused disturbances, caused damage or have criminal records.
If it is ok with your landlord...yes. Are you asking if your tenents insurance will cover the family members loss? More than likely not. Why not call your agent and ask.
They were Junkers
Yes, the estate can sell the property to non-family members.
Why not? Even family members can rent to one another.
As far as I know, Yes...as a friend of mine is on Sec. 8 and his brother owns a 4 family house...if landlord applies and does everything right...it shouldn't matter if it is a relative. I'd check your own state you live in to find out the deets. NOT TRUE: Unless the recipient is disabled and it is essential that a family member become his landlord, Federal regulations PROHIBIT family members: siblings, parents, grandparents, and uncles/aunts from owning the property from which a recipient rents his home.
Socialists - today mostly called social-democrats - never were against private property as such. They only protested (especially in the early 20th century) against the sometimes very unequal way in which wealth in some countries was divided and against the lack of care for people who could not provide for themselves - the lack of social security, basically. Even the Communists were not against private property as such, but they had a habit of taking away property from people who were considered 'capitalists'. The 'ideal' of a community where no-one had any property so that all property was communal and where people were given an income according to their needs, where a larger income was almost excusively based on a family being larger of members needing special care, was never put into practice anywhere. Only North Korea comes close but of course the ruling elites there have no lack of property, income and perks.
To have a remedy, you need to frame the problem in legal terms, not emotional ones. Just because you fear them doesn't make it a problem in the eyes of the law, any more than fearing a person of a different racial group. The easiest way to solve this problem is for you to move. The next easiest thing is to increase your understanding of them so you can find if your fear is real or baseless. If it is real, call the police. The best chance you and your landlord have of evicting the gang members (I am assuming you are in the US here) is to find evidence they are dealing drugs on the property. If they are doing that, not only can the landlord evict them, he MUST evict them. He cannot ignore drug dealing. Any criminal activity is grounds for eviction but, for whatever reason, drug dealing is afforded special status in the eyes of the law.
junkers
Under federal law family members cannot rent out their property to tenants on section 8 because of the potential for fraud. If the family member is severely disabled and is dependent upon the potential family landlord, they can apply for an exception.
The triumvirate members who fought against Brutus and the conspirators were Octavian and Marc Antony.
they almost have the same property -erick