No, not unless that citizen is a member of congress. Throughout history, controversial decisions by presidents have led certain members of the public to call for impeachment. But this can only occur through a procedure that comes from congress, so if citizens feel strongly that a president deserves to be impeached (not because they dislike his policies but because they believe he has broken the law), these citizens should contact their members of congress and express their reasons why they believe the president deserves impeachment.
While in office, a US President is largely (but not completely) immune from being charged in criminal or civil matters, except through the process of impeachment.
However, Another Country may bring charges through their own legal processes--and Malaysia has convicted Bush of war crimes. Obama is presently under indictment there. You could give testimony, via an 'amicus curiae' (friend of the court) letter, or just trust that he will also be condemned.
They could, and they often do. Throughout history, controversial decisions by presidents have led certain members of the public to call for impeachment. But this can only occur through a procedure that comes from congress, so if you feel strongly that a president deserves to be impeached (not because you dislike his policies but because you believe he has broken the law), contact your members of congress and express your views to them.
Not really. The constitution says impeachment has to be initiated by Congress. Citizens who believe a president (any president) deserves to be impeached need to contact their member of congress to discuss why they believe this punishment is warranted.
The airing of grievances has always been a right of U. S. citizens, but it's up to Congress to decide if impeachment is warranted.
no
impeachment
Reason for impeachment of president
Such a vote in the House of Representives is called an impeachment.
As President of the Senate, the U.S. Vice President presides over most impeachment trials. However, Article I, Section 3, Clause 6 of the U.S. Constitution specifies that when the President is on trial the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presides. And although the Constitution doesn't say, I assume that would also be the case if the Vice President were the defendant in an impeachment trial (an incumbent U.S. Vice President has never been impeached to date).
Impeachment originates in the House of Representatives by member who feel that the President is acting unlawfully, corruptly, imcompetently, and so forth. The House also votes on impeachment. After there is a successful impeachment, the Senate then debates the issue, and can either decide either on conviction and removal from office, or to not convict.
No. If the president is found guilty by 2/3 of the Senate, he is stripped on his office and is no longer President . ( I suppose, however, that some might still call him "President".)
You could still call him vice president or he has been a senator or a governor you could use that title.
This is an example of public opinion as an informal check on the president. The sending of telegrams by the public to Congress demonstrated widespread dissatisfaction and a call for action against President Nixon, which eventually led to his impeachment proceedings.
the Electoral College, or you could call them the Electors.
The president or other federal official must be formally charged with a crime (impeached) by the House of Representatives by a simple majority vote. This impeachment by the House requires the US Senate to hold a trial based on the impeachment charges. When the trial is over, two-thirds of the senators must vote to convict in order to remove the official from office. Although impeachment is only the first step, the entire process is popularly referred to as impeachment.
The citizens of Ireland are Irish.
The Chief Justice of the United States (Supreme Court) presides over the impeachment of a President; an "Impeachment Trial Committee" comprising Senators selected by the Presiding Officer of the Senate is in charge of all other impeachment trials. This practice began in 1986 when the Senate amended its rules and procedures for impeachment trials.