Knowledge in any branch of science can be applicable in any other branch, and that is particularly true of the applicability of chemistry to Biology. All of biology ultimately depends upon chemistry. Life is a chemical process.
Scientists are almost always team workers now - there is too much information to review and too much work to be done for a single scientist to design, research, set up, run, log and analyze the data from his own experiments. Interestingly, it isn't just biologists working with biologists - it is biologists working with epidemiologists and physicists and statisticians and geneticists. The latest findings in one field can have enormous potential in another field, so scientists from different disciplines are working together and talking about what they've learned and what they are thinking about.
Other scientists can use that knowledge - either to confirm or correct a scientist's findings.
Scientists create graphs to visually represent data and to better understand patterns and relationships within the data. Graphs allow scientists to analyze and interpret information more easily, identify trends, and communicate their findings to a wider audience. Graphs also help scientists make predictions and draw conclusions based on the data they have collected.
Scientists repeat others' experiments to double check their findings as well as to find new information that might have been missed initially.
by useing science
to help other scientists who are stuck on the same thing
To document the findings or document that there were no findings or that they were in conclusive
In 1665 there was very little science as we know it, so there was not any "findings" . Those who did experiment and create wrote books.
Scientists first create an hypothesis. They develop methods to prove their hypothesis. In order for other scientists to replicate the findings and prove or disprove another scientist's outcome, the original scientist MUST describe the methods used and the findings.
Mainly sell it, use it to form calculations, hypothesis, or just input in spreadsheets, or write their findings in journals, or make cool stuff, or scare people with useless information.
Its important because other scientist can know what they're working on and if its accurate, or if they can improve their findings.
Usually a new idea or even a different angle on a commonly held theory will be submitted for peer review, that is a scientist will submit their findings to a major scientific journal such as Nature, etc. Various scientists will then read, discuss, dissect, question the proposal for accuracy or feasibility.