#include <iostream>
#include <conio.h>
int linearSearch( const int array[], int length, int value);
int main()
{
const int arraySize = 100;
int a[arraySize];
int element;
for( int i = 0; i < arraySize; i++)
{
a[i] = 2 * i;
}
element = linearSearch( a, arraySize, 10);
if( element != -1 )
cout << "Found value in element " << element << endl;
else
cout << "Value not found." << endl;
getch();
return 0;
}
int linearSearch( const int array[], int length, int value)
{
if(length==0) return -1;
else if (array[length-1]==value) return length-1;
else return urch( array, length-1, value);
}
it is in c++ language ,u can change it to c by including stdio.h ,printf & scanf.....i think it wud be beneficial
have a look their too. similar program like that and easy understanding
http://fahad-cprogramming.blogspot.com/2014/02/linear-search-program-in-c-using.html
Iteration is more efficient.
It gets you to the answer with fewer steps.
You will get principal variation from iterative deepening search using sequential moves within the framework. It is important to note that this may slow down the search due to space requirements.Ê
Binary search requires that the list be in search key order.
_node* search (_node* head, _key key) { _node* node; for (node=head; node != NULL;;) { if (key == node->key) return node; else if (key < node.>key) node = node->left; else node = node->right; } return node; }
A binary search is much faster.
It gets you to the answer with fewer steps.
You will get principal variation from iterative deepening search using sequential moves within the framework. It is important to note that this may slow down the search due to space requirements.Ê
Binary search requires that the list be in search key order.
_node* search (_node* head, _key key) { _node* node; for (node=head; node != NULL;;) { if (key == node->key) return node; else if (key < node.>key) node = node->left; else node = node->right; } return node; }
Binary trees are commonly used to implement binary search tree and binary heaps.
A binary search is much faster.
It is 10111111 in binary. Try a search for '191 to binary'.
The only items suitable for a binary search are those which are in a sorted order.
no they are not same
The only drawback I know of is that binary search requires that the list already be sorted. So if you have a really large unsorted list than binary search would not be the best option.
There is a good method outlined is this answer: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_do_you_convert_57_into_binary A quick way is to use Google calculator: Enter "43 in binary" into Google's search field (without the quotes) It returns 43 = 0b101011
By using Depth First Search or Breadth First search Tree traversal algorithm we can print data in Binary search tree.