Terrorists come in many shapes and sizes. While it is possible that there are terrorists who commit acts of terrorism because they feel that the harm generated by their act will be far outweighed by positive consequences of the action, I would think they would be more Kantian, albeit in a twisted sort of way – remaining true to their ideology, regardless of the utility of their actions.
Turkey
Turkey
Turkey
consequences of the act.
practice
Utilitarians
To end poverty and injustices
Utilitarians
rules and principles are the essential foundation for ethics.
There are some terrorists from Iraq. However, most Iraqis are not terrorists, and most terrorists are not from Iraq.
If people having certain rights generates positive utility, then utilitarians must respect those rights in all cases where the benefits of respecting those rights outweigh the negatives of interfering in those rights. It's a very case-by-case basis with utilitarianism.
Terrorists are terrorists, who knwos their motive whether their Islamic, Jewish or Christian terrorists, one things for sure they are a disgrace.